AI Rate Professor

Industrial Technology

Justin Verrell

WOOD · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid this professor if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationNot RecommendedUnhelpful TeachingArrogant Tone
  • The only review .
  • Teaching quality is described as poor because communication and learning support are weak.
  • There is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

The low difficulty rating suggests the class may not be hard, but there is A.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The class appears low in difficulty, but poor teaching may make learning harder than the content itself.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student directly recommends choosing another teacher because the class feels unhelpful.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The tag says grading is based on few things, but the .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Light

70/100

The low difficulty rating suggests the workload may be light, but the .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

The only review says students should pick another teacher and criticizes communication heavily.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says the class is a waste of time.

Main concern

Poor communication and weak teaching support are the main concerns.

What students said

“Pick another teacher if you want to learn.”
WOOD
“Arrogant and has little to no communication skills.”
WOOD

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format, proctoring, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pick another teacher if you want to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and communication. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“Pick another teacher if you want to learn.”

👎 Recommendation Level

5/100

“Waste of time.”

💬 Communication

5/100

“Arrogant and has little to no communication skills.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Pick another teacher if you want to learn.
  • Arrogant and has little to no communication skills.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Overall Experience

  • Waste of time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one short review with limited detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

WOOD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values