AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jae Choe

Courses not reported · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you value engaging lectures and are willing to keep up with reading and notes, but be cautious about the online format.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent In-Person LecturesCaring and AccessibleExtra Credit AvailableReading HeavyOnline Clarity Risk
  • In-person reviews are very strong, with , and useful class discussions.
  • The single online review is sharply negative and .
  • Getting a strong grade looks realistic with , and , but it is not effortless.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A or high grade looks , and participation, but students do not describe it as automatic.

, while the online review suggests harder grading and confusion.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material is easier in person because and discussion-based, but and online confusion add challenge.

In-person reviews describe the class as easy to follow, while the online and reading-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

and participation matters, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews emphasize helpful lectures and participation, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students strongly recommend him for experience.

, while the only online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

and lecture-based test preparation make grading feel fairly forgiving in person, though the online review calls him tough.

Format shift

In-person comments mention and test help, while the online review includes a .

Workload

Moderate

54/100

The workload is manageable for engaged students but and participation.

Format shift

Both formats mention reading pressure, with the online review sounding more negative.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

In-person teaching is praised as , and engaging, but the online experience appears much weaker.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is excellent, while the .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests rather than a single dominant assessment type.

Format shift

and participation, while the online review does not clearly describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students consistently describe him as , and .

Main concern

Students , and pay attention.

What students said

“I found very easy to follow and understand because of his way of speaking.”
30501
“pretty much gives all of the answers for the tests as long as your taking notes and paying attention.”
30501

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative and and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“This and confusing.”
30501
“A lot of reading.”
30501

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests appear tied closely to lecture notes, but reviews do .

Tests Based On LecturesNotes Are ImportantExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if students take notes and pay attention, but detailed exam rules are not clearly proven.

Tests Based On LecturesNotes Are Important
“pretty much gives all of the answers for the tests as long as your taking notes and paying attention.”
30501
“That AI is not allowed.”
30501

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“10/10 recommend.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“I found very easy to follow and understand because of his way of speaking.”

👍 Recommendation Level

80/100

“ very though provoking.”

📚 Workload Reality

54/100

“A lot of reading.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I found very easy to follow and understand because of his way of speaking.
  • .
  • He gives very in .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Effort

  • It was actually easy taking his class.
  • On campus Lectures and conversations may be attended and are very interesting and helpful.
  • pretty much gives all of the answers for the tests as long as your taking notes and paying attention.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Risk

  • This and confusing.
  • He gets upset with you when you misunderstand instructions.
  • A lot of reading.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews provide useful evidence, but the online conclusion rests on only one review.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

305015 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1