AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Engineering

Priti Brahma

ENGR25 · ENGR35 · ENGR3 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already have strong engineering confidence and want strict real-world standards despite a harsh classroom experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedCondescendingTough graderImpatientHigh workload
  • Most in-person reviews describe poor organization, weak teaching, impatience, and a condescending classroom tone.
  • The course can reward strong students, but many reviewers say the instructor makes the class harder than the material itself.
  • as strict or meticulous, with homework and participation concerns.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Several students earned A grades, but , and instructor-related frustration make the A costly.

All evidence comes from In person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students often say the instructor makes the class more complex and difficult, even when the underlying material is not the main issue.

Only In person reviews exist, and they consistently describe instructor-driven difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation matters appears in the tags, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most reviewers strongly discourage taking the class because of disorganization, condescension, and poor teaching support.

The recommendation evidence is entirely In person and overwhelmingly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Multiple reviews tag or and little tolerance for mistakes.

Format shift

Only In person reviews discuss grading, and the .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention lots of homework and .

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students describe disorganization, poor explanations, impatience, condescension, and weak support.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely In person and mostly severe.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention assignments, homework, rubrics, participation, and , suggesting mixed assessment methods.

Format shift

Only In person reviews provide assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with repeated complaints about disorganization, impatience, condescension, and .

Main concern

Students say the instructor's organization and classroom manner make the course much harder than it needs to be.

What students said

“She gets a 1.”
Engr-25
“She has almost no patience and is really condescending if you're not smart.”
Engr-25
“ ”
ENGR-35
“Hard no.”
Engr-25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , while exam format and proctoring are not clearly proven.

Exam Corrections

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring, open-book rules, or final format.

Exam Corrections
“ and allows ”
ENGR-35

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She has almost no patience and is really condescending if you're not smart.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She may know things but she doesn't know how to teach them.”

⚖️

15/100

“ , as if you were designing a real bridge which must meet strict safety standards.”

👍 Recommendation Level

15/100

“Try someone else if you can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Priti is not adequately prepared.
  • She may know things but she doesn't know how to teach them.
  • Priti is a new instructor based on her lack of organization and constantly getting stumped for answers to pretty basic student questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Her class can be two times more complex.
  • , as if you were designing a real bridge which must meet strict safety standards.
  • . .

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Climate

  • She has almost no patience and is really condescending if you're not smart.
  • Overall, I found Priti come off as rude, impatient, condescending, and would act as if it were an inconvenience if you asked her a simple question during class.
  • Despite her lack of ability, she completely lacks humility, passion, compassion and kindness. Hard no.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight recent In person reviews provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence, though one review strongly defends her standards.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

Engr-255 reviews
ENGR-352 reviews
ENGR-31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2