AI Rate Professor

English

Anny Mogollon

ENGLISH · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless , and little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear ExpectationsHarsh AttendanceRigid GradingDismissive Communication
  • , and attendance expectations.
  • as rigid, with participation and effort not meaningfully recognized.
  • The main issue is communication, not the intellectual difficulty of English content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Grades reached A- or B, but and little credit for effort or participation.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content is not clearly described as advanced, but shifting expectations and .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

but applied harshly, making flexibility very low.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because , and support were consistently criticized.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

and did not fairly recognize participation or effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Reviews focus more on , so workload itself is not clearly overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students consistently describe the professor as , and not student centered.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and engagement but do not clearly mention exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are in person and , and dismissive communication.

Main concern

Students struggled with shifting expectations and .

What students said

“Course structure and .”
ENGLISH
“ and felt disproportionate.”
ENGLISH
“Requests for clarification and accommodation were met with dismissiveness.”
ENGLISH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and shifting expectations.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“The .”

⚖️

10/100

“Changes occurred with limited notice, and .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“Not supportive or student centered.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The .
  • and shifting expectations.
  • communication .

Theme 2

⚖️ About Policies & Grades

  • Course structure and .
  • and felt disproportionate.
  • Participation and effort were not adequately recognized.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

and all are from the same date, but their complaints are detailed and consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGLISH3 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values