AI Rate Professor

Biology

Kalebi Shayo

BIOL22 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you are ready for a demanding in-person biology course with , and limited support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest HeavyMandatory AttendancePop QuizzesUnaccommodatingLecture Heavy
  • Students consistently describe the class as difficult, test-heavy, and poorly supported.
  • Attendance is mandatory and students report , and heavy reading.
  • One student earned an A, but only through major discipline and independent textbook study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible, but comments , and studying beyond lecture slides.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course is intellectually difficult because and require textbook-level preparation.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

Attendance is clearly mandatory and .

, and they describe it as strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend him because they report , and poor accommodation.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students describe difficult , and little support for struggling students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

The class includes heavy , and an individual poster project.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students say he is passionate but often off-topic, unprepared, hard to reach, and not accommodating.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Reviews repeatedly describe the course as test-heavy with pop quizzes, multiple exams, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a hard, test-heavy course with , and weak support.

Main concern

Students feel unsupported and .

What students said

“Felt very unsupported as a student seeking help in his class.”
BIOL-22
“ .”
BIOL-22
“Be as in depth as his exams.”
BIOL-22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exams are described as difficult and test-heavy, with pop quizzes and questions that .

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyFree Response QuestionsSelect All That Apply QuestionsThree Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

response and select-all questions, and three exams.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyFree Response QuestionsSelect All That Apply QuestionsThree Exams
“The class is difficult, with questions.”
BIOL-22
“multiple quizzes, 3 exams, with projects.”
BIOL-22
“ as in depth as his exams.”
BIOL-22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Literally do not.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in exams, workload, and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Often unprepared.”

🧪

20/100

“The class is difficult, with questions.”

⚠️ Student Support

22/100

“Felt very unsupported as a student seeking help in his class.”

Theme 1

🧪 About Exams

  • Asked him various times for study guides to help with and it was shot down every time.
  • The class is difficult, with questions.
  • as in depth as his exams.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Be as in depth as his exams.
  • multiple quizzes, 3 exams, with projects.
  • you have to rely on reading the whole textbook chapters instead of .

Theme 3

🚫 About Support

  • Not accommodating whatsoever.
  • Felt very unsupported as a student seeking help in his class.
  • He is and not very accommodating.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

and consistently describe the same risks.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BIOL-225 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1