AI Rate Professor

Business

Taylor Apparcel

BA10 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless you are comfortable , and a heavy workload independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor feedbackConfusing gradingHeavy workloadUnresponsiveInconsistent experience
  • , and weak communication.
  • Online students especially , and little response from the professor.
  • , but it is outweighed by four recent negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned high grades, but , and poor feedback make the A feel unreliable rather than easy.

Online reviews are especially negative about grading and workload, while and one good review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The business content itself does not sound extremely hard, but confusing instructions and .

Online difficulty comes from workload and , while in-person comments conflict on whether lectures help.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a , though online weekly discussion work creates regular participation pressure.

Online reviews mention weekly discussions, while in-person reviews do not .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students advise against the class because of , and .

Online reviews are uniformly avoidant, while but one recent strong warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Recent students describe questionable, unclear, AI-based, or .

Format shift

Online reviews drive the harsh grading concern, while AI grading.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and work assigned during exam weeks.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly heavy, while mentioning projects and lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe poor feedback, unresponsive communication, confusing instructions, and ineffective lectures.

Format shift

Online reviews are very negative, while but the most recent in-person comment is also strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews emphasize projects, , and quizzes more than major exams.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on discussions and written assignments, while and future quizzes or exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is split between one recent harsh review and one .

Main concern

The recent in-person , and little help.

What students said

“Very slow lectures with a lot of rambling”
Ba-10
“ and little to no help.”
Ba-10
“His lectures are super helpful for .”
Ba-10

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are consistently , and poor email responsiveness.

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“don't expect any responses to your emails or .”
Ba-10
“Taylor uses AI to grade but makes you write why AI is bad.”
Ba-10
“Overall, I would advise avoiding.”
Ba-10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mostly discuss assignments, grading, projects, and .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyQuizzes or Exams MentionedAssignment Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Quizzes or Exams MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“His lectures are super helpful for .”
Ba-10

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyAssignment Heavy
“This professor assigns so .”
Ba-10
“There is a .”
Ba-10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, I would advise avoiding.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Very slow lectures with a lot of rambling (likes to talk about his life) and .”

⚖️

22/100

“The way he grades is questionable, if you .”

👍 Recommendation Level

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Feedback

  • .
  • he stopped giving feedback on assignments leaving you confused about what you did wrong on the assignments.
  • His lectures are super helpful for .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Taylor uses AI to grade but makes you write why AI is bad.
  • I and they gave me no real answer on why they do it that way.
  • Takes forever to grade any work.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • This professor assigns so .
  • There is a .
  • and little to no help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited because there are only 5 reviews, though four recent reviews are detailed and strongly consistent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

Ba-105 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 2