AI Rate Professor

English

David Gejeian

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGLISH1A · ENGL1A81402 · ENGL1 · ENG3 · ENG3A · ENG125 · ENG100 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a motivating English and rewards steady effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat feedbackInspirational teacherTough but fair graderParticipation heavyFunny and engaging
  • Students overwhelmingly praise Gejeian for , and helping them improve as writers.
  • Getting an A is realistic with participation, effort, rubric-following, and communication, but .
  • Online sections are more discussion-heavy and less personal, while and classroom energy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

79/100

An A is very reachable if , and revise from feedback.

In-person reviews more often call the class easy with effort, while online reviews show more workload and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course is understandable and well guided, but writing, reading, discussions, and .

In-person sections feel clearer and more engaging, while online sections and discussions.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

as formally mandatory, but participation and showing up are repeatedly tied to success.

In-person reviews strongly stress attendance and participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him because , and care help them become better writers.

Recommendation is strongest in person, while online reviews remain positive but more mixed due to workload and grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

He is often called fair and clear, but many students note that .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough essay grading more often, while and clear rubrics.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

The , and participation, but many students say it is manageable with effort.

Format shift

Online sections have many discussions and essays, while in-person sections .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students consistently describe him as engaging, funny, caring, clear, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize energy and connection, while online reviews emphasize organization and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment , and occasional quizzes or tests rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention essays, discussions, a midterm, and a final, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise , and detailed writing feedback.

Main concern

Participation, reading, essays, and .

What students said

“He made coming to class enjoyable through his lectures and I always left inspired to write better.”
ENG1A
“ .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise organization and feedback but , and .

Main concern

Online sections can feel discussion-heavy and .

What students said

“There were a LOT of discussions that he posted (maybe 1-2 every week).”
ENG3
“ to essays (only had 3), but he gave good feedback on them”
ENG3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and standard, with some online tests based on lecture and textbook and .

MidtermFinalLecture And Textbook Based TestsOccasional Pop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove major exam format or proctoring rules.

Occasional Pop Quizzes
“He assigns an easy book and .”
ENGLISH1A
“Always do the but he may give you a .”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews mention a , and and the textbook, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or lockdown software.

MidtermFinalLecture And Textbook Based Tests
“ , and a final.”
ENG3
“The and the textbook.”
ENG3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He made coming to class enjoyable through his lectures and I always left inspired to write better.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“He will really help improve your writing.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“100% would take again!”

⚖️

58/100

“He will grade critically but tell you exactly how to improve.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made coming to class enjoyable through his lectures and I always left inspired to write better.
  • High energy and keeps class interesting.
  • and concise.

Theme 2

✍️

  • and arguments.
  • He tells you exactly what you need to .
  • and tell you EVERYTHING you need to fix on it.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you participate and do your work you will be fine.
  • If you come to class, participate in lecture, turn in assignments and don't use AI you'll get an A.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews across many years and both formats provide detailed, consistent , and recommendation.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 510
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A15 reviews
ENG38 reviews
ENGLISH1A4 reviews
ENG3A2 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG1001 review
ENG1251 review
ENGL11 review
ENGL1A814021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 4 · A 12 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1