AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Geraldy Eisman

PSY36 · PSY2 · PSY16 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you can handle inconsistent organization and want a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaring professorEasy workloadInconsistent organizationSlow communicationOpen-note online exams
  • Many students praise her care, passion, and support, especially when the course is organized well.
  • Grades are often easy, but , and inconsistency are recurring risks.
  • Online reviews are more polarized than in-person reviews, with some strong praise and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is usually reachable because the workload and , but disorganization and .

Online students report more risk from inconsistency, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content is usually understandable, though some .

Online reviews mention reading-heavy modules and some difficult exams, while and exams easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

64/100

Flexibility varies by course, with online work being flexible but because lectures are not uploaded.

Online courses allow more independent pacing, while and taking notes can be necessary.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

69/100

and generous, but repeated organization and communication complaints lower confidence.

In-person recommendation is stronger, while online recommendation is split between very positive and strongly negative experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students often report easy assignments, flexible deadlines, , and simple grading, though .

Format shift

but less reliable, while as easy and feedback-oriented.

Workload

Light

75/100

Most reviews describe little homework, weekly discussions, short assignments, or easy tasks, with some exceptions for reading-heavy courses.

Format shift

Online workload ranges from light modules to heavy research reading, while .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Her care and , but inconsistent organization, communication gaps, and weak lectures in some online reviews limit the score.

Format shift

In-person teaching is generally stronger, while online teaching has .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment includes , and occasional presentations.

Format shift

Online reviews mention exams and discussions, while , and sometimes no exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, , and a caring personality.

Main concern

because lectures may not be uploaded and .

What students said

“Lectures are not uploaded so .”
Psy2
“No hw, 2 quizzes, no exams, and 1 creative presentation for the final.”
Psy2

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with easy work and caring support balanced by serious complaints about communication and organization.

Main concern

She may grade late, respond slowly, miss office hours, or change course structure.

What students said

“Overall, I taught myself taking her class”
PSY36
“ and .”
PSY36

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style varies by course, with explicit open-note online exams in one review and easy or .

Open-Note Online ExamsOptional Final PaperEasy In-Person ExamsNo Exams In Some Sections

Assessment risk

Varies

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in some PSY2 sections, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policy.

Easy ExamsNo Exams In Some SectionsNotes Matter
“Very few in-class assignments. and .”
Psy2
“No hw, 2 quizzes, no exams, and 1 creative presentation for the final.”
Psy2

Online

Online reviews explicitly support open-note textbook exams in PSY16, but .

Open-Note ExamsOpen-Textbook ExamsThree ExamsOptional Final Paper
“ .”
PSY16
“ and the option of a .”
PSY16

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good news, you will not have a lot of work. Bad news, she does not grade in a timely manner and she is hard to reach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Dr. Eisman is a passionate, knowledgeable, and caring professor.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“ . Went MIA a few times during the semester. Very inconsistent.”

📈 Grade Effort

78/100

“It was an easy class, and .”

Theme 1

❤️ About Care & Support

  • She truly wants students to succeed and supports their educational journey.
  • She really cares about her students and their success!
  • She prioritizes mental health. Very sweet.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • The , and none of them took me longer than 30 minutes.
  • There is and if you pay attention to class.
  • The work itself isnt difficult, I just wish she would prioritize students.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization & Communication

  • and .
  • Went MIA a few times during the semester.
  • She didn't attend her own office hours every time I went.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

The rating uses 22 reviews across online and but polarized evidence about care, workload, and organization.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSY3611 reviews
Psy26 reviews
PSY165 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 6 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values