AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Vi Trang

MATH103080769 · MATH103 · MATH5B · MATH11 · STATC1000 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
22.81%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid Trang unless you are already strong in , and are comfortable with strict grading and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderHeavy homeworkTest heavyStrict methodsSelf-teaching required
  • Most reviews strongly warn against taking Trang because of , and low flexibility.
  • Students often say they had to teach themselves and were penalized for not using his exact method.
  • A minority of students say disciplined, math-confident learners can succeed with practice, participation, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students still earn A grades, but comments show that , and self-teaching.

Online reviews sound harsher and less supported, while for strong math students.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The material may not always be inherently hard, but the class becomes challenging because of , and .

Online students more often report self-teaching, while in-person students more often describe group work, cold-calling, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

34/100

Participation, engagement, and class methods matter heavily, but reviews do not prove a .

In-person reviews emphasize cold-calling and group participation, while online reviews emphasize lectures, deadlines, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

23/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and stressful interactions.

Both formats contain strong avoidance warnings, with online reviews especially negative about self-teaching and rigidity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students repeatedly call him a , and small details.

Format shift

especially reporting cheating accusations and strict method enforcement.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly describe daily or , and hours of work.

Format shift

Online reviews describe long daily homework loads, while and exams.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most students describe unclear teaching, limited help, and self-teaching, though a and helpful.

Format shift

Online reviews are more negative about recorded lectures and self-teaching, while but still mostly critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Reviews repeatedly mention 7 exams, test-heavy grading, homework as , and exams carrying major weight.

Format shift

Both formats are exam-heavy, with online reviews giving the and no dropped scores.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but heavily negative, with many students citing strict grading, unclear help, cold-calling, group work, and .

Main concern

In-person students worry , and discomfort asking for help.

What students said

“ , so you never have time to study”
MATH11
“On tests and of answers”
MATH11
“if ur weaker in ”
MATH11

Remote format

Online

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing heavy homework, strict grading, recorded lectures, self-teaching, and .

Main concern

Online students most often complain , and exams that dominate the grade.

What students said

“You will have to teach yourself and somehow figure out how to do his method.”
MATH11
“ 3-4 rs of hw daily.”
MATH103
“No use of a notecard & not open book even though his lectures state that.”
MATH11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

with many exams and limited flexibility, while proctoring and webcam rules are not clearly proven.

7 ExamsNot Open BookNo NotecardStrict Exam TimingTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test-heavy grading, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

7 ExamsTest HeavyStrict Formatting
“told us we had 7 EXAMS but u can get extra cred”
MATH11
“ , so you never have time to study”
MATH11
“On tests and of answers”
MATH11

Online

Online reviews mention 7 exams, no notecard, , and , but do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use.

7 ExamsNot Open BookNo NotecardStrict Exam Timing
“7 exams.”
MATH11
“No use of a notecard & not open book even though his lectures state that.”
MATH11
“Only two ”
MATH103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will have to teach yourself and somehow figure out how to do his method.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“He teachers one or two examples on the lecture and expects you to learn the rest by yourself”

⚖️

14/100

“On tests and homework, he is quite strict with the formatting of answers and if the formatting isn't like the example in class.”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“ 3-4 rs of hw daily.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You will have to teach yourself and somehow figure out how to do his method.
  • He just uploaded the recorded lectures with 3 or 4 examples and expects more from you.
  • I found his teaching to be very easy to understand and follow

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He !
  • On tests and of answers
  • so its hard to maintain a steady grade when youre struggling.

Theme 3

📝

  • and tests.
  • 7 exams.
  • , so you never have time to study

Theme 4

⚠️ About Fit

  • if ur weaker in
  • if you don't have any others or a job.
  • If your good at math, you should be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

97/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across both formats with repeated, detailed, and highly consistent complaints.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 58
1 out of 534

Course coverage

MATH1128 reviews
MATH10312 reviews
STATC10007 reviews
MATH1030807692 reviews
MATH5B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 4 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

14

B+ 7 · B 4 · B- 3

C range

8

C+ 1 · C 4 · C- 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1