AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Harkiran Dhah-Powell

CHEM3 · CHEM1AL · CHEM3A · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself chemistry and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Teaching RequiredTough GraderPoor CommunicationMandatory AttendanceHeavy Homework
  • Most students say she is nice but ineffective at explaining chemistry concepts.
  • Several reviews , and disorganized materials.
  • A small minority liked her lectures and , but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments show that getting there often , and .

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students describe fast , and chemistry concepts that require outside learning.

, and they mostly describe the course as difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is mandatory or crucial, even when students felt lectures were not useful.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and forced to self teach.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention lots of , and a need for substantial outside study.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Most students say , and is hard to reach.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person and strongly negative despite a few positive outliers.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and group work, with no single method fully dominating.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and weak communication.

Main concern

though lectures do not help enough.

What students said

“Had to .”
CHEM3A
“ and discourages questions during lecture.”
CHEM1AL
“I would not recommend her to anyone, more than half the class failed.”
CHEM3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe hard or mismatched tests, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or a .

Hard TestsStudy Guides Not Similar To TestsFlashcard Policy Changed

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

do not match tests, and a late change about flashcards for the final, but do not clearly prove a full exam policy.

Hard TestsStudy Guides Not Similar To TestsFlashcard Policy Changed
“Study guides .”
CHEM1AL
“ ”
CHEM3A
“We “couldn't” have a flashcard for final and last minute we could?”
CHEM3A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Nice but didn't teach well.”

⚖️

25/100

“ and discourages questions during lecture.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Had to .
  • All she did was read off the .
  • , and what she teaches don't match.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Her lectures are difficult as she goes fast and expects you to keep up.
  • but contain a lot of math.
  • more than half the class failed.

Theme 3

📬 About Support

  • She DOES NOT answer emails.
  • and does not have office hours.
  • Hard to communicate with as .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 12 reviews span several years, include detailed examples, and show consistent concerns despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM3A7 reviews
CHEM1AL3 reviews
CHEM32 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1