AI Rate Professor

English

Tino De Guevara

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and heavy writing without much structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear RubricsToo Many PapersKind But DisorganizedGroup Project Heavy
  • Students repeatedly say assignments and .
  • Workload is heavy for an English course, with many papers and group projects.
  • One review praises his kindness and flexibility, but most reviews advise choosing another professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Grades include several A-range outcomes, but students describe heavy writing, vague rubrics, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is not described as intellectually extreme, but and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly describe attendance rules, though one student says he allowed a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students warn against taking him because , and workload outweigh his kindness.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students report , and assignments returned too late to improve future work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and group projects packed close together.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

He is described as kind, but students repeatedly , and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and group projects rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a kind professor but , and too much writing.

Main concern

Unclear rubrics and .

What students said

“ . not very tech savvy.”
80170
“Assigns too much work. and writing an entire essay that is only worth 5 points.”
80458
“ but doesn't give them back in time for us to review before the .”
80458

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with one in-person final moved online for illness and .

In-Person Final With Online Makeup

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One review says the but was allowed online due to illness, while other exam policies are not clearly proven.

In-Person Final With Online Makeup
“I got sick the morning of the final and was supposed to go in so I emailed him and he was very understanding and .”
80170

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't pick this teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in clarity, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

35/100

“he is a kind and genuine person, .”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Assigns too much work. and writing an entire essay that is only worth 5 points.”

⚖️

35/100

“he never made a he'd just say follow MLA format.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not very tech savvy.
  • and contradicting in his assignments which leads to confusion.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • .
  • His

Theme 3

⚖️

  • .
  • made a few errors that cost people % on their grade and didn't fix it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but the sample is small and split by course.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

801702 reviews
804582 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values