Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
58/100An A is realistic for students who attend, read, and complete papers, but penalties and .
The one online review suggests support can help, while attendance and grading risks.
PHIL1A · PHIL1 · PHIL1CH · 1C · PHIL2 · PHIL1D · PHILLOGI · PHIL6 · PHIL680557 · PHIL4 · PHIL1C · PHILO6 · LOGIC8064 · 62 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
An A is realistic for students who attend, read, and complete papers, but penalties and x x x x x x x.
The one online review suggests support can help, while x x x x x x x x attendance and grading risks.
Is the course easy?
The philosophy and logic content ranges from manageable to abstract and difficult, especially when readings, papers, or logic concepts build quickly.
Online evidence is too limited but positive, while in-person x x x x x x x, and boring delivery.
Is attendance flexible?
x x x x x x x x x penalties or makes passing difficult.
x x x x x x, while the single online review does not clearly describe attendance policy.
Is this professor recommended?
He is recommended by students who like philosophy and independent effort, but many others x x x x x, and x x.
The online review is positive, but the x x x x x x x.
Course guide
Grading
Strict
34/100
Some students call him generous, but many report tough paper x x x x x x, and limited grade posting.
Format shift
Online evidence shows helpful support, while in-person evidence contains repeated complaints about tough or x x.
Workload
Heavy
35/100
Workload varies by course, but many reviews mention lots of x x x x, and attendance-based work.
Format shift
Online workload is unclear from one review, while x x x x x- and paper-heavy.
Teaching experience
Average
52/100
He can be caring and intellectually strong, but x x x x, and perceived bias create a very uneven experience.
Format shift
Online comments praise videos and office hours, while in-person comments are polarized between inspiring support and dull or x x.
Assessment method
Balanced
55/100
Grades commonly x x x x x x x, and occasional homework rather than one single assessment type.
Format shift
Online evidence mentions quizzes and tests, while x x x x x x x, and attendance points.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
In-person reviews are polarized, with praise for care and insight but x x x x x x, and grading.
Main concern
Strict attendance and x x x x x x x x x or need clear rubrics.
What students said
“You lose A LOT of x x x x!”
“Boring lectures, interesting topics though.”
Remote format
Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
The single online review is positive and says office hours and lecture videos helped with quizzes and tests.
Main concern
Only one online review limits confidence.
What students said
“go to office hours!!”
“his lecture videos are pretty good.”
Exam style
Exam style varies by course, with comments supporting essay tests, quizzes, tests, study guides, and x x x, but not a single consistent policy.
Assessment risk
Varies
50/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person evidence mentions essay tests, open-book daily quizzes, difficult tests, study guides, and x x, so the exam policy varies by course.
“Professor Stannard uses essay tests that require the x x x x.”
“The x x x x and he basically gives you the answers, but they aren't always easy.”
The one online review mentions quizzes and test or quiz help, but does not x x x x x x x x.
“he would fully x x x x x and x x x x x x x.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“He is the x x x x x x x x.”
“The biggest thing about taking this class with professor Stannard is a I didnt learn anything.”
“As long as you attend lecture, you can get an A.”
“If you decide to miss one class, he will take away 20 points (20/0), which will demolish your grade.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
50
Recent reviews read by the AI
62
Lifetime ratings
94/100
Evidence confidence
Fifty reviews across many years give rich evidence, though older reviews and course variation make the professor highly context-dependent.
Inside 50 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
32 reported outcomes
A+ 2 · A 16 · A- 2
B+ 3 · B 4 · B- 1
C 1
No reported values
No reported values
Not sure yet 2 · Rather_Not_Say 1