Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
72/100A strong grade is realistic because he gives extensions, , and clear reviews, but students still must complete a lot of .
and , while online reviews show the same grade path but with heavier workload complaints.
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
A strong grade is realistic because he gives extensions, x x, and clear reviews, but students still must complete a lot of x x.
x x x x x and x x x, while online reviews show the same grade path but with heavier workload complaints.
Is the course easy?
Accounting is repeatedly described as tough or intense, but his support and examples make it manageable for prepared students.
In-person students more often say he makes hard material understandable, while online students more often struggle with lecture length and organization.
Is attendance flexible?
Attendance matters in several in-person reviews, with one saying it is mandatory, but x x x x x and catch-up help.
In-person reviews provide the main attendance evidence, while online reviews focus on x x x x x.
Is this professor recommended?
Students recommend him because x x x x x x and x x, and prepares students well when they keep up.
x x x x x, while online recommendations are positive but more mixed due to workload and organization issues.
Course guide
Grading
Lenient
72/100
He is often described as x x x x x x x, and x x, though a few students call tests or grading tough.
Format shift
Leniency is strongest in in-person reviews, while x x x x x but include more frustration with workload.
Workload
Heavy
25/100
Students repeatedly report lots of McGraw Connect x x x x x x, and long lectures.
Format shift
Both formats report heavy work, with online reviews especially emphasizing time burden and weekly assignment volume.
Teaching experience
Good
82/100
Most reviews describe him as caring, knowledgeable, patient, and helpful, though online organization and communication receive criticism.
Format shift
In-person teaching is consistently praised, while online teaching ranges from great support to terrible organization.
Assessment method
Balanced
55/100
Grades appear to combine homework, quizzes, discussions, x x x x x, and x x x.
Format shift
Online reviews mention McGraw work, quizzes, discussions, projects, and x x x x x; in-person reviews mention homework, participation, tests, and x x.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person reviews are strongly x x x x x x x x, and flexibility despite heavy work.
Main concern
Homework and x x x x, and some students struggle with exams.
What students said
“x x x x x x x x x the test.”
“There were lots of x x x x x x x.”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Online reviews are mixed, praising flexibility and care but x x x x x and occasional disorganization.
Main concern
The online format can feel workload-heavy and x x x x x.
What students said
“A LOT of homework.”
“his class is fairly easy to pass as along as you do the homework.”
Exam style
Exam risk is moderate because x x x x x but x x x x and difficult accounting tests.
Assessment risk
Standard
62/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
x x x x and x x x x, but do not clearly prove closed-book, proctoring, or open-book rules.
“the x x x x x x x x test”
“will give a x x if someone needs it.”
Online reviews mention quizzes, an optional review exercise, and x x x x x, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.
“The x x x x and x x.”
“quiz , and a discussion post.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“He will go the extra mile to make sure you have everything you need to pass his class and understand the material.”
“This is one of the most caring teachers I've ever had, if you pay attention and stay on top of the x x x x x x x x.”
“You will be doing 110+ acct questions a week.”
“x x x x x x x x x x opportunities he gives along the amount of due date extensions for the HW.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
25
Recent reviews read by the AI
25
Lifetime ratings
94/100
Evidence confidence
Twenty-five reviews across 2019-2025 provide broad, detailed, and mostly consistent evidence with x x x.
Inside 25 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
25 reported outcomes
A+ 5 · A 9 · A- 2
B 4
C+ 2 · C 2
No reported values
F 1
No reported values