AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Gurinder Khaira

ENGR1 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you will attend, participate, and keep up with grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditGroup ProjectsSupportiveMandatory AttendanceSometimes Harsh Grading
  • Most students find him supportive, approachable, and strong as a mentor.
  • Grades are very achievable if students attend and .
  • The , and occasional harsh or delayed grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very , and , but it is not effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course is manageable and often laid back, but projects, competitions, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show moderate content difficulty with project-based work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and missing class can mean missing in-class assignments.

, and they clearly describe it as required.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

Most students recommend him because he is supportive and offers many .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , but several comments describe harsh grading, unclear requirements, or late feedback.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they mix generous recovery options with .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and competitions, with some flexibility when the class struggles.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they describe a project-heavy but manageable workload.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Students mostly see him as supportive, caring, and mentor-like, though and rude.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears , and class participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessments, and they focus on projects and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a projects, and a clear need to attend and complete work.

Main concern

Some students report , and .

What students said

“easy A if .”
ENGR1
“he graded the work a bit harshly.”
ENGR1
“ .”
ENGR1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz, midterm, or final exam policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“easy A if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Other than that he is an amazing teacher and maybe even mentor.”

📈 Grade Path

82/100

“easy A if .”

⚖️

58/100

“he graded the work a bit harshly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He takes communication seriously too.
  • Mr. Khaira was a decent teacher who helped whenever I had any questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • lots of .
  • A lot of .
  • Khaira would extend due dates with no penalty.

Theme 3

🧩 About Class Structure

  • 2 group projects & 2 competitions.
  • Group projects were about 60-70% of the class.
  • Classwork was easily done during class and "hw" was what wasn't done in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent in-person reviews provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence with .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR17 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values