AI Rate Professor

Art

Chad Jones

ART28144 · ART80180 · ART80947 · ART7 · ART80047 · ART1 · ART2 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him if you want a and rewards honest effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportive FeedbackBeginner FriendlyCaring InstructorExtra CreditEasy A
  • Students unanimously describe him as caring, patient, respectful, and highly supportive.
  • The class is beginner-friendly, with and a quality-over-quantity workload.
  • Grades appear very attainable through effort, participation, and appropriate materials.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Students report high grades, easy grading, , and success based mainly on effort and participation.

Both online and in-person reviews support an easy A, with and fun class structure.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course starts from the basics and works well for beginners, even when students have different experience levels.

and fair effort-based grading, while in-person reviews strongly emphasize beginner-friendly instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

because some in-class assignments count for credit, but students report he may allow makeups if they communicate.

Online reviews focus on participation, while and possible makeups.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Every review is highly positive because students feel supported, respected, and genuinely helped by his teaching.

Both online and format pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students describe fair effort-based grading, , and easy A outcomes without harsh drawing-skill penalties.

Format shift

Online reviews say effort determines the grade, while and easy A outcomes.

Workload

Light

78/100

The workload is described as quality over quantity and manageable, though students still need to complete projects and participate.

Format shift

Online evidence is limited but positive, while and enjoyable workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

100/100

Students consistently , and ability to teach beginners clearly.

Format shift

Both formats show excellent teaching, with and in-person reviews highlighting patience and fundamentals.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears centered on projects, drawing work, participation, and in-class assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention projects and participation, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students consistently describe him as , and easy to succeed with.

Main concern

Some in-class credit can be missed if students are absent.

What students said

“The class started from the basics and he taught the class as if you were an absolute beginner.”
ART7
“his class is so much fun and its an easy A”
ART80047

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students , and fair grading based on effort.

Main concern

Students still need to participate and have the appropriate materials.

What students said

“ , and ”
ART7
“Your effort in the class determines your grade.”
ART1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class started from the basics and he taught the class as if you were an absolute beginner.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and beginner fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

100/100

“Chad is an amazing instructor.”

💬

100/100

“ , and they are actually helpful unlike other professors.”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“his class is so much fun and its an easy A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He genuinely cares about his students and .
  • very passionate and
  • Always made me feel comfortable to share things from my religion and culture .

Theme 2

🧑‍🎨 About Skill Level

  • There were people of all levels and it never felt like there was an experience gap.
  • The class started from the basics and he taught the class as if you were an absolute beginner.
  • He was very respectful and .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Work

  • His workload was quality over quantity.
  • Your effort in the class determines your grade.
  • and gave us so many opportunities for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews are unanimous and detailed about teaching quality, but the sample is modest and has limited assessment-policy detail.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART72 reviews
ART11 review
ART21 review
ART281441 review
ART800471 review
Show 2 more courses
ART801801 review
ART809471 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values