AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Edison Gonzalez

PE16 · HLTH2 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if possible, but be cautious with online sections because communication and organization are major risks.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOnline disorganizedIn-person supportiveLots of readingHomework heavyFair grading
  • Online reviews often , and textbook-driven work.
  • In-person reviews are much stronger, praising his approachability, clarity, and hands-on activities.
  • Grades appear attainable, but the workload can feel busy and uneven by format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A grades are common, but students , and format-dependent frustration.

Online students earned high grades despite poor organization, while as straightforward if weekly work is completed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content sounds manageable and mostly introductory, but , and .

preparation, while online reviews make the same content feel more tedious and disorganized.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

In-person participation matters, while online sections naturally rely on remote work and do not show a .

In-person evidence mentions required participation, while online evidence does not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

but often warn against the online experience because of slow responses and poor organization.

, while online reviews are mostly negative except for one older positive review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Grades are generally high and one review calls him a , but and grade-control complaints reduce confidence.

Format shift

Online reviews show attainable grades but unreliable grading logistics, while and fairness.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, textbook lessons, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online workload is described as reading, lessons, quizzes, and tests, while , and hands-on scenarios.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He appears helpful and but often absent, unresponsive, and minimally instructional online.

Format shift

Teaching experience is sharply split, with strong in-person support and weak online presence.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, reading assignments, quizzes, tests, participation, group projects, and hands-on work.

Format shift

Online assessment leans toward textbook questions, quizzes, and tests, while , and scenarios.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, approachable instructor who uses participation and hands-on work.

Main concern

Students still report regular reading, participation, and .

What students said

“He helps you with the work or questions you have and does require you to participate.”
HLTH2
“ and understanding.”
HLTH2

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed to negative, with repeated complaints , and heavy reading.

Main concern

Poor online communication and organization can make the class frustrating even when grades are attainable.

What students said

“Doesn't respond to emails and .”
HLTH2
“He does not teach at all just has you read the textbook and .”
HLTH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

QuizzesTestsNo clearly proven proctoring policyNo clearly proven open-book policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, finals, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

QuizzesTestsNo clearly proven proctoring policy
“You are assigned a lesson which you answer quite a bit of questions, then you do a quiz.”
HLTH2
“He does not teach at all just has you read the textbook and .”
HLTH2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want a nice and , but online students often report poor communication and organization.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, communication, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He helps you with the work or questions you have and does require you to participate.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“So if you want to waste time and .”

⚖️

66/100

“ , and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • but not a great teacher.
  • He does not teach at all just has you read the textbook and .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • lots of .
  • As long as you read what you're supposed to each week and complete a homework assignment (which you might get 3-4 a week) each week this class will feel like a breeze.
  • The classwork is purely textbook.

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • Doesn't respond to emails and .
  • Emailed him to ask a question and he didn't answer until a week later.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years provide useful pattern evidence, but opinions differ strongly by course format.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HLTH26 reviews
PE161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values