AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer Simonson

ENG1A · E125 · ENGLISH46B · ENGL1A · ENG46B · ENGL3 · ENGL125 · ENG3 · ENGLI125 · ENGL72 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
86.36%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

She is a strong choice if you will keep up with reading and writing and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring FeedbackFlexible Late WorkWriting HeavyMostly RecommendedOccasionally Harsh Grader
  • Most students , and support.
  • The and writing, but flexible policies often make grades attainable.
  • A minority of students report .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

An A is very attainable with steady effort because , and , but writing work is still required.

Both formats can lead to high grades, though and in-person has more late-work flexibility praise.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The material is accessible for many students, but , and revision make it more than a free pass.

Online reviews emphasize predictable structure, while and writing practice.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance helps and some students say to attend regularly, but reviews do .

In-person reviews stress showing up more than online reviews, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

Students recommend her because , and flexible with late work.

, but online has one recent negative review about communication and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Late-work , and many A grades outweigh recurring but less common harsh-grading complaints.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention extensions and often, while online reviews are positive overall but .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Students report lots of reading, essays, and papers, but many say the structure and flexibility keep it manageable.

Format shift

Both formats involve reading and writing, with online work described as predictable and in-person work sometimes called heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students describe her as , and helpful, though a small minority report poor communication or .

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews are both mostly positive, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment , and writing assignments rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats rely mainly on reading and writing assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, flexible late work, and clear assignments, while older reviews note harsh grading and heavy writing.

Main concern

Students who dislike writing or and standards frustrating.

What students said

“As long as you show up to class and !”
ENG1A
“ .”
E125

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews , and manageable reading and writing, with one major complaint about confusing grading.

Main concern

One online review reports poor communication and an .

What students said

“Schedule is repetitive and predictable which I liked.”
ENGL3
“ .”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and assignments, and they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or strict testing policies.

Midterm Not Clearly ProvenFinal Not Clearly ProvenEssay-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final in-class essays, but broader reviews focus mostly on papers and assignments.

In-Class EssaysMidtermFinal
“ .”
ENGL1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives really good and and allows late work without penalty.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“This is the English course.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

87/100

“ !”

⚖️

78/100

“ professors, but it's designed to make it EXTREMELY easy to keep track of what you need to do to earn your desired grade!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Professor, very caring and kind.
  • Loved the structure of the class.
  • Dull, boring, unmotivated instructor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you aren't lazy an A is guaranteed.
  • The workload could be a lot at times but she has a veryyyy flexible late work policy
  • She grades harsh.

Theme 3

📝 About Writing Work

  • Its a reading and writing class so and writing.
  • Four or five papers and and an A.
  • An essay is due every 2 wks

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-four reviews over many years give rich detail, with consistent themes despite some older negative outliers.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1A14 reviews
ENG36 reviews
ENGL35 reviews
ENG46B2 reviews
ENGL1252 reviews
Show 5 more courses
E1251 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL721 review
ENGLI1251 review
ENGLISH46B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 4 · A 12

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3