AI Rate Professor

Languages

Janice Smith, Warshaw

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you need guidance, patience, or while learning ASL.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnapproachableDoes Not RespondSnaps At StudentsTest HeavyNot Beginner Friendly
  • Students describe her as rude, unapproachable, and unwilling to help beginners.
  • Both reviews and makes students afraid to ask for help.
  • The only format evidence is in person, and the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Grades do not look impossible, but the hostile support environment makes earning an A costly for students who need help.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The ASL content may be learnable, but poor support and unapproachable teaching make the course feel difficult.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe an .

optional or mandatory, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students directly warn against taking her because they find her rude, unhelpful, and unresponsive.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

A test-heavy tag and very negative difficulty comments suggest grading and assessment feel demanding rather than forgiving.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload evidence is limited, but the and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students repeatedly describe her as rude, unapproachable, unhelpful, and unresponsive.

Format shift

, and both are strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The only direct assessment tag says the class is test heavy.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report an intimidating classroom where help is hard to get and communication is poor.

Main concern

Students feel unable to ask for help and say she snaps at them.

What students said

“Doesn't respond to emails, snaps at her students for the so ever.”
81550
“Miss. Warshaw was very rude and seemed unapproachable most times.”
81550

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly show a test-heavy structure, with no proof of details.

Test Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews only support that the course is .

Test Heavy
“Test heavy”
81550

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If feels like you can never ask for help in her class which was very disappointing for those just trying to learn this beautiful language.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and communication; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Miss. Warshaw was very rude and seemed unapproachable most times.”

📧 Communication

10/100

“Doesn't respond to emails, snaps at her students for the so ever.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Miss. Warshaw was very rude and seemed unapproachable most times.
  • Easily snapped at her students.

Theme 2

🆘 About Help And Support

  • If feels like you can never ask for help in her class which was very disappointing for those just trying to learn this beautiful language.
  • And .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, consistent, and detailed enough to support a .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

815502 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1