AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Dejan Pavic

PHYSCI2 · ENGR8 · ENGR10 · SCI1A · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can handle long lectures, strict grading, group work, and but not relaxed class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderLecture HeavyGroup ProjectsAttendance MattersClear Test Material
  • Reviews are split between students who find him caring and clear and students who find him harsh, dry, or unfair.
  • Grades can be good, but students report , and .
  • guides, so memorization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Many students earned A-range grades, but they usually , and tolerating strict grading.

Online evidence shows effort with labs and homework, while , and memorization.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material is often understandable and test-aligned, but , and memorization add challenge.

Online evidence emphasizes difficult labs and homework, while in-person reviews vary from easy and dry lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple reviews say attendance matters and on time.

Both online and in-person evidence say attendance matters, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

, but the strict grading and dry lecture style create real hesitation.

The online review is positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and students describe hard grading, petty deductions, and effort-based grades.

Format shift

, while the online review does not call grading unfair.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students mention weekly , and long lectures.

Format shift

and homework, while in-person evidence adds projects, papers, and lecture-heavy work.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

, and inspiring, while others describe him as inconsiderate, dry, and unfair.

Format shift

The online review is strongly positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and presentations.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes labs and homework, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

test preparation and guidance but repeated complaints about tough grading, long lectures, and attendance pressure.

Main concern

, and group projects can frustrate students.

What students said

“ , so MEMORIZE.”
ENGR10
“Super petty when it comes to grading(he marks 0.1 off if he feels like it)”
ENGR10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review says he is caring and accessible, but , and .

Main concern

Labs and , and .

What students said

“The labs and class but he will guide you in the right direction if you ever get stuck.”
SCI1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and or guides, but reviews do not prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policies.

Tests From Lecture SlidesStudy Guide Similar To TestsPop QuizzesAdditional Final

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say tests come from lecture slides or study guides and mention pop quizzes and an additional final, but .

Tests From Lecture SlidesStudy Guide Similar To TestsPop QuizzesAdditional Final
“ , so memorize the slides.”
ENGR10
“Gives you a study guide that .”
ENGR8
“ , and but all doable.”
PHYSCI2
“there is one group project that you have to do but you still have an .”
PHYSCI2

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He made you work for your grade, the effort you put into this class reflected on your grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessments; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“ thoroughly.”

⚖️

28/100

“Super petty when it comes to grading(he marks 0.1 off if he feels like it)”

📚 Workload And Exams

32/100

“Gives assignments every week, either 1 page or a paragraph on a subject.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Pavic really cares about his and very understanding.
  • He does a good job of connecting with students.
  • He is a fair teacher, the lectures a long and dry unfortunately.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • He made you work for your grade, the effort you put into this class reflected on your grade.
  • Hes a but it's only to your benefit
  • he grades very unfairly.

Theme 3

🧪 About Work And Assessments

  • There are a and he does grade on the quality of submitted papers.
  • , but he grades very unfairly.
  • The labs and class but he will guide you in the right direction if you ever get stuck.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across multiple years and courses provide detailed, , and teaching style.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGR106 reviews
PHYSCI22 reviews
ENGR81 review
SCI1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values