AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Lianna Evans

PSYC2 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless , and limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationHeavy workloadConfusing assignmentsTough gradingLecture heavy
  • Most online , and harsh interactions.
  • Workload is repeatedly described as heavy, especially with frequent assignments and papers.
  • A small amount of in-person evidence is positive, but it is outweighed by recent negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Grades are possible, but students report , and needing to recover.

Online reviews make the A feel costly and stressful, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels hard mainly because , and workload is high.

Online reviews are much more negative, while and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a .

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend her because of , and harsh or condescending interactions.

, while in-person reviews are mixed with one strong positive outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Many students describe tough grading, missing feedback, AI accusations, and as a grade saver.

Format shift

Online reviews show the harshest grading concerns, while and heavy assessments.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students repeatedly , and workload that is hard to manage.

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially overwhelming, while and .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews describe unclear lectures, poor communication, rude interactions, and weak support.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is strongly negative, while but several major complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Reviews mention , and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments, while , and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with one strong recommendation but several complaints , and writing.

Main concern

Lectures can feel long and distracted, with heavy writing or exams.

What students said

“ , and there was a 12-page deep research project.”
PSYC2
“Her lectures were brilliant, inspiring, and informative.”
80536

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, , and rude responses.

Main concern

Students say she does not respond clearly or support them when problems arise.

What students said

“She doesn't communicate unless its during office hours and .”
PSYC2
“This professor gave us 10 assignments a week, and many of them were heavy hitters like 3 75-point assignments in the same week.”
80536

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, exams, and major papers, but do .

Small QuizzesExam HeavyResearch Project

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Small QuizzesExam HeavyResearch Project
“Hw was not bad; and small video notes.”
PSYC2
“ , and there was a 12-page deep research project.”
PSYC2

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She doesn't communicate unless its during office hours and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Her lectures will 9/10 times leave you with more questions than answers.”

⚖️

20/100

“if she gives you a low grade on something don't expect to see a comment because you won't get any”

🧱 Workload Pressure

12/100

“This professor gave us 10 assignments a week, and many of them were heavy hitters like 3 75-point assignments in the same week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are really bad and long for no reason.
  • Lectures were brilliant, inspiring, and informative.

Theme 2

📬 About Communication

  • She does not respond to students when they reach out for help.
  • She doesn't communicate with me correctly and accused me of AI MULTIPLE times to the .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Expect 1-3 assignments due every day or every other day.
  • Lots of , and self-investigating for answers.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Ten recent reviews provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence, especially for online communication and workload problems.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PSYC27 reviews
805363 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1