AI Rate Professor

Art

Janice Ledgerwood

ART37A · ART37B · ART42 · ART2 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you want a , but respect her class rules and stay off your phone.

Best fit · Easy A HunterSweet and caringEasy gradingHelpful feedbackPhone strictnessArt projects are manageable
  • Students consistently describe Ledgerwood as kind, caring, and helpful.
  • Grades are very easy to earn if , and .
  • The main classroom concern is strictness about phones and occasional limited help with technical questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

An A is very easy for students who try, complete projects, attend, and follow basic class rules.

, while the single online review supports leniency but has limited sample size.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Students repeatedly say the art classes are not difficult, with manageable assignments and project expectations.

, while the online review notes tutorials can be harder to understand.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

because notes, slides, and class behavior matter, but reviews do not show a .

In-person reviews stress always going to class and taking notes, while the online review focuses on office hours and due-date flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students recommend her because , and makes art courses easy to pass.

Both formats are positive, but online evidence comes from only one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

because students say trying your best or completing basic expectations leads to passing or A grades.

Format shift

, and the online review adds leniency with due dates during emergencies.

Workload

Light

84/100

Workload is light, with students mentioning few major assignments, manageable projects, and easy tests or classwork.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds very light, while the online review notes tutorials may require extra effort.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students see her as caring, sweet, helpful, and engaging, despite one concern about answering technical questions.

Format shift

Both formats praise her support, with online support shown through office hours and emails.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears , and slide-based tests depending on the art course.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention projects, chapter assignments, papers, midterm, final, and slide tests, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, caring, and passable with effort, though she is strict about phone use.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Her classes are not difficult at all and are very fun.”
ART42
“If you try, you pass”
ART42
“do not be on your phone.”
ART37A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review praises her caring , and deadline leniency, while noting tutorials can be harder online.

Main concern

Online tutorials may be .

What students said

“She offered office hours 3 days a week, each an hour and a half.”
ART37B
“Tutorials can be a little hard to understand online.”
ART37B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but , and a final rather than unusually strict testing.

Slide-Based TestsMidtermFinalFew Major Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

67/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, open-book exams, or take-home exams.

Slide-Based TestsMidtermFinal
“ over and few questions about the art peices.”
ART2
“ , and a final.”
ART2

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you actually show you have tried your best at making an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Very sweet teacher who is very helpful and considerate.”

📈 Easy A Potential

95/100

“If you try, you pass”

⚠️ Main Concern

50/100

“do not be on your phone.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very sweet teacher who is very helpful and considerate.
  • I truly enjoyed Professor Ledgerwood's class!
  • She is a sweet, caring professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Difficulty

  • Her classes are not difficult at all and are very fun.
  • If you actually show you have tried your best at making an .
  • Not hard. Just study

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Rules And Support

  • Stay off your phones!
  • Tutorials can be a little hard to understand online.
  • She is lenient about due dates if you have an emergency.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews are consistent and useful, but the sample is small and only one review covers the online format.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART22 reviews
ART37A2 reviews
ART422 reviews
ART37B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values