AI Rate Professor

History

Wesley Willison

HISTORY11 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless , and teaching yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveStrict GraderDisorganized CanvasHeavy ReadingLate Grading
  • Students repeatedly describe poor communication and little help.
  • Online students can still earn high grades, but the and self-taught.
  • , no late work, and little support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Online students earned A- grades with manageable work, but and no make the overall A path risky.

Online evidence suggests a possible A with self-management, while and low flexibility.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content sounds manageable, but , and weak instruction raise the practical difficulty.

Online reviews describe easy completion but poor structure, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly establish an , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most reviews warn against him because of , and little support.

because one student found it easy, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students cite tough grading, no late work, no , and major assignments graded late.

Format shift

In-person reviews are harshest, while online grades were higher but still criticized for few graded items and uncertainty.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload , and repeated complaints about lots of homework.

Format shift

Online work is described as weekly notes and discussions, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and politically distracting.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize missing lectures and bad Canvas structure, while and strictness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and major assignments more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mostly describe .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly negative, with , and poor help from the professor.

Main concern

and no late-work flexibility create high risk.

What students said

“DOES NOT HELP YOU”
History-11
“ ”
History-11

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but weak instruction, poor Canvas organization, and little communication.

Main concern

Students say the .

What students said

“If you want a class to fly through this would be a great one.”
History-11
“ or ”
History-11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Only answers emails in once sentence answers and DOES NOT HELP YOU.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ or ”

⚖️

20/100

“he is very strict he does not except late work and does ”

📚 Workload

30/100

“Every week you have to write 10 notes from the textbook and do a discussion”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • DOES NOT HELP YOU
  • or
  • sometimes he goes off on political tirades

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • did
  • he is very strict
  • If you want a class to fly through this would be a great one.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent reviews give consistent concerns, but the sample size is small and format evidence is limited.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

History-114 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values