AI Rate Professor

Art

Emily Schellenberg

ART81010 · ART281010 · ART281016 · ART2 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
79.31%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

She is a strong choice for , and want a generally easy art class with engaging lectures.

Best fit · Easy A HunterFunny LecturerEasy A FriendlyClear AssignmentsAttendance SensitiveExtra Credit
  • Most students describe the class as easy, interesting, and .
  • Online reviews are especially positive, with light weekly work and .
  • A smaller cluster of in-person reviews complains about attendance penalties, lecturing issues, and unfairness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Students often report easy exams, manageable assignments, , and many A grades if they keep up.

Online reviews make the Easy A case strongest, while in-person reviews are still easy for attentive students but .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

The course content is usually described as and simple assignments.

Online students call the structure very easy, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

grades, even though online work is more schedule-based.

Online reviews mention weekly lecture watching, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes art interesting.

Online reviews are almost uniformly positive, while but include a notable recent negative cluster.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Most students call grading fair or and , despite a few complaints about unfair grading.

Format shift

Online grading is described as lenient and clear, while and attendance-related penalties.

Workload

Light

82/100

Work usually consists of lectures, discussions, quizzes, projects, papers, and exams that students describe as manageable.

Format shift

Online workload is especially light, while and note-taking.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students commonly describe her as funny, engaging, passionate, and helpful, though .

Format shift

Online teaching is consistently praised, while but less consistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to come from a mix of exams, quizzes, discussions, projects, papers, and .

Format shift

Online sections emphasize discussions, quizzes, exams, and projects, while , and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive about humor, lectures, easy tests, and , but and classroom control.

Main concern

Attendance and tardiness can affect the grade in some in-person sections.

What students said

“Beware of !”
ART2
“LOVED HER CLASS!!! and funny .”
ART2
“ and she has study guides for them.”
ART2

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are highly positive, calling the , and lenient with manageable weekly work.

Main concern

Students still need to keep up with .

What students said

“Super easy class.”
ART2
“All you get and .”
ART2
“Good professor, .”
ART2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because students report , and at least one online open-book format.

Open Book Online ExamsEasy ExamsStudy GuidesLecture-Based TestsQuizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and tests based on notes or slides.

Easy ExamsStudy GuidesLecture-Based Tests
“ and she has study guides for them.”
ART2
“Most of the time the and the !”
ART2

Online

and easy quizzes or exams, but do not clearly prove webcam or proctoring rules.

Open Book ExamsWeekly QuizzesLecture-Based Exams
“All you get and .”
ART2
“There is and a quiz every 3-4 weeks.”
ART2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is probably the . I went in thinking art appreciation would be difficult and boring but she made it great!”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Her lectures were fun to watch and helped me a lot for sure.”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“As long as you stay on top of your one assignment a week and this class.”

🕒

35/100

“Excessive tardiness and absences will result in a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes art history very interesting and
  • Her lectures are very informative, and interesting to listen to.
  • Lectures are informational and as long as !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super easy class.
  • and still ended with an A.
  • I Loved her!! she is the ! so funny and a !!

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Beware of !
  • She power trip over every and exams.
  • Lack the abilities to control a room and articulate the materials clearly during lecture.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 29 reviews across both formats with detailed comments, though .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ART224 reviews
ART810103 reviews
ART2810101 review
ART2810161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 11 · A- 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1