AI Rate Professor

Art

Lindsey Preciado-Weaver

ARTART2 · ART3 · ARTART · ART2 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
58.82%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a critique-heavy art class and can , and substantial project work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy ProjectsStrong FeedbackPassionatePolarizing
  • many students praise her passion and feedback, while others strongly warn against taking her.
  • ART3 and online experiences often mention strict grading, heavy drawing workload, harsh comments, and firm late policies.
  • Students , and , but easy-credit seekers face real risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

A grades are possible when students follow directions and submit work on time, but strict grading, harsh critique, and .

an A, while online ART3 reviews show higher risk from workload and late penalties.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The course content is manageable for some students but becomes challenging through frequent projects, critique expectations, fast lectures, and art experience demands.

Online ART2 sounds easier, while online and in-person ART3 reviews more often .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Reviews mention mandatory discussion boards, participation, showing up, and no-late-work policies, so flexibility appears limited.

and strict deadlines, while in-person evidence emphasizes showing up and visible effort.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether the student values direct critique and art workload or wants a low-stress elective.

, while online reviews are sharply polarized with several severe warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Many reviews call her a tough grader, cite harsh comments, strict late work rules, and picky critique, though some students find the .

Format shift

Online reviews include the harshest grading and late-policy complaints, while .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Workload , and mandatory discussions, with several students calling it time-consuming.

Format shift

Online ART3 has the strongest heavy-workload warnings, while papers and tests.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is praised as passionate, knowledgeable, and helpful by many students, but harsh communication and severe negative experiences lower the overall teaching score.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is more favorable, while online and poor communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Assessment appears , and critiques, with quizzes or tests mentioned less often.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize discussions, drawings, projects, and timed quizzes, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive overall about passion, feedback, and creativity, but still warn that and .

Main concern

Students who dislike critique, fast lectures, or .

What students said

“All the and and suggestions for improvement.”
ART3
“The and a bit tiring, but they were creative and interesting.”
ART2
“Her art appreciation class is not easy.”
ART2

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are split between students who found the class doable with and students who found it harsh, poorly communicated, and workload-heavy.

Main concern

Strict late rules, heavy illustration workload, and harsh or are the main online risks.

What students said

“The class felt relatively easy with small tasks like doing some reading (~40 pgs), mandatory discussion boards, and small projects.”
ART2
“She will not allow you to turn in anything overdue, past two days, NO MATTER WHAT.”
ART3
“2 full illustrations a week!”
ART3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is not consistently described, with limited evidence of timed one-attempt quizzes online and , but .

Timed QuizzesOne AttemptFairly Easy QuizzesTests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

ART2 section, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or .

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“There are 4 art projects , and 5 tests.”
ART2

Online

Online , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book status, or proctoring policy.

Timed QuizzesOne AttemptFairly Easy QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ but they're fairly easy.”
ART2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great for passionate artists, difficult and irritating if you aren't.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ and helps your creativity.”

⚖️

34/100

“ and leaves very harsh comments on your assignments.”

📚 Workload Pressure

32/100

“she was assigning 4 full drawings a a week & then switched it to two.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and is there to help you succeed.
  • Her passion for what she teaches really rubs off on you wether you are into Art or not.
  • She doesn't know what she's doing in .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Her 2 dimensional class is easy as long as you put effort into it and turn in your work on time.
  • Her art appreciation class is not easy.
  • it is not hard to get an "A" in this class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload And Critique

  • The and a bit tiring, but they were creative and interesting.
  • She will critique your work and .
  • 2 full illustrations a week!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 24 reviews span many years, include both formats, and give detailed but clearly polarized evidence.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ART312 reviews
ART210 reviews
ARTART1 review
ARTART21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 8

B range

3

B 1 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Rather not say 3