AI Rate Professor

Film

K Miko

FILM1 · FILM2A · FILM2B · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

unless you only need a low-effort credit and , and grading frustration.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandPoor organizationRude feedbackEasy but not usefulInconsistent grading
  • Most students strongly criticize the teaching experience, especially clarity, communication, and classroom management.
  • The class is often described as easy or lightly assigned, but students .
  • Online reviews are especially negative about harsh or and lack of help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Despite harsh grading complaints, many in-person reviews call the class easy and several students received A grades with limited work.

In-person evidence often says the class is easy, while online evidence includes a C- and F with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content appears light and , but and film analysis expectations create frustration.

In-person reviews frame the course as easy but pointless, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some students say attendance matters or people leave after roll, but reviews do not show a .

Attendance comments come from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly warn others away because they find the , and unrewarding.

Both formats are negative, with online reviews and support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Some students still earn A grades, but many describe tough, inconsistent, or .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize harsh and inconsistent grading, while mark-downs.

Workload

Light

78/100

Most reviews describe few assignments, journals, films, one paper, or a final, though .

Format shift

In-person workload is often described as minimal, while online workload feels harder because .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Reviews repeatedly cite unclear , and little learning value.

Format shift

In-person complaints focus on lecture clarity and classroom problems, while online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mainly mention film journals, papers, scripts, clips, and a .

Format shift

Both formats appear assignment-heavy, with and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews repeatedly say the class is easy but poorly , and not useful.

Main concern

Students often say they cannot understand lectures and learn little.

What students said

“ . You can't understand anything, and I mean anything she says.”
FILM2B
“The class is easy, however, but .”
FILM2B

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, , and failed outcomes.

Main concern

Students report and little useful help online.

What students said

“ professor.”
FILM2B
“rude &unhelpful but I gave her online class a chance was 10x worse.”
FILM2A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam policy, or .

Final mentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

a Google doc, but do not clearly prove broader exam rules.

Final mentionedGoogle Doc final mentioned
“ and the .”
FILM2A
“there's a " , but it is extremely easy.”
FILM2B

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is easy, however, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ and teacher I have ever had!”

⚖️

28/100

“even though she has a .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ unless you have to.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't explain the the mouse off the screen or go full-screen, is rude sometimes.
  • and you can’t understand a word she says.
  • Professor Miko is one of the her and she doesn't respond to your emails when you're in need of help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Barely assigns anything besides making a film clip and script.
  • The class is easy, however, but .
  • She is critical on your journals so be prepared for .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • there was almost always some sort of technical difficulty with starting the films and students would have to sit and do nothing for a half hour.
  • Very rude to students. Unaccessible outside of class and not helpful inside class.
  • This was a very pointless class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across many years show a consistent negative pattern, with enough detail to outweigh a few positive or neutral comments.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 512

Course coverage

FILM2B10 reviews
FILM2A7 reviews
FILM13 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 2