AI Rate Professor

English

Melanie Scriptunas

ENG1A · ENGL3 · ENGLISH1A · ENG3 · ENG105 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and are willing to attend, participate, and revise your work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackWriting-heavyParticipation mattersExtra creditCaring instructor
  • and say it improves their writing.
  • The class involves substantial writing, reading, participation, and in-class work.
  • , but a few online reviews describe hard grading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

Grades are usually strong because of feedback, revisions, and , but the writing load and .

In-person reviews show clearer support and revision paths, while online reviews and harsh zero-based grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The assignments are not usually conceptually hard, but , and participation make the course require steady effort.

Online students report more stress from instructions and grading, while in-person students describe better guidance through class participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation are important because missing class can mean losing credit or missing graded in-class work.

, while online reviews emphasize participation and assignment completion.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and helps them improve as writers.

, while online reviews are more mixed because of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

69/100

She offers revisions, feedback, and , but some and zeros.

Format shift

and revision-based, while online grading has the harshest complaints.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload includes many essays, readings, annotations, participation, and in-class assignments.

Format shift

Both formats involve writing, but online reviews more directly call it a lot of writing.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students usually describe her as , and especially helpful with .

Format shift

In-person teaching is consistently praised, while online teaching has a .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is centered on essays, drafts, annotations, participation, and class assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are consistently positive, emphasizing helpful feedback, participation, revisions, and .

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter because many assignments happen in class.

What students said

“ !”
ENG105
“It is important to attend her class because if you don't you'll receive no credit.”
ENG1A
“Go to class because she has in-class assignments that .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with praise for communication and feedback but and .

Main concern

Online students may feel stressed by writing volume, grading rules, or .

What students said

“a lot of writing but so you can fix it.”
ENG1A
“She grades so hard.”
ENG1A
“her instructions for the .”
ENGLISH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a specific exam format, .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and in-class assignments but do not clearly prove exam format.

Online

Online reviews discuss writing assignments and grading but .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I grew so much as a writer during this semester, and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ !”

⚖️

69/100

“she pregrades your rough draft so that you can go back and fix mistakes and still get a decent grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • !
  • and gives opportunities to get .
  • so you can fix it.

Theme 2

📝 About Writing Load

  • a lot of writing but so you can fix it.
  • Although you have about 4 or 5 essays, she pregrades your rough draft
  • does mainly in-class assignments and annotations.

Theme 3

📌

  • It is important to attend her class because if you don't you'll receive no credit.
  • participation matters.
  • Go to class because she has in-class assignments that .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 9 reviews with good detail, but the sample is small and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A5 reviews
ENG1051 review
ENG31 review
ENGL31 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values