AI Rate Professor

English

Daniel Ayala

ENGL1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you specifically want a and writing workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy writing workloadTough gradingLots of readingParticipation pressureLow recommendation
  • All reviews rate the class poorly and describe a very demanding English workload.
  • Students report , and pop quizzes.
  • The only A+ still required major effort, so high grades do not mean the class is easy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A may be possible, but reviews , and sustained effort.

Both online and in-person reviews describe heavy work, with and pop quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course feels challenging because assignments are long, reading is heavy, and .

Online evidence focuses on long assignments, while , and pop quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

In-person comments describe random reading calls and class participation pressure, while .

; online evidence does not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because the workload is heavy and the .

Both formats are negative, with the online and in-person reviews focused on writing and reading pressure.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tags and comments and demanding writing work.

Format shift

, though the online sample is only one review.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Every review describes large .

Format shift

The workload concern appears in both formats and is strongest across all available comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews give uniformly low quality ratings and focus on workload stress rather than useful instruction.

Format shift

Both formats are negative, but there is too little online detail to separate teaching style clearly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears centered , and occasional quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

quizzes, and writing projects that require major effort.

Main concern

Students must keep up with reading, participation, and writing projects.

What students said

“ ”
ENGL1A
“Be prepared to read a lot and ahead of time”
ENGL1A
“Also be prepared to put in a lot of effort in .”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review describes too many long, hard assignments that interfere with other classes.

Main concern

The workload is heavy and time-consuming.

What students said

“Too many long and ”
ENGL1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a main exam format, but readings.

Pop Quiz MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam FormatReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but does not clearly prove exam, midterm, or final format.

Pop Quiz Mentioned
“sometimes assign a ”
ENGL1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Too many long and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting workload, reading, writing, and ; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Pressure

8/100

“Too many long and ”

⚖️

15/100

“Also be prepared to put in a lot of effort in .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Too many long and
  • Also be prepared to put in a lot of effort in .

Theme 2

📖 About Reading And Participation

  • Be prepared to read a lot and ahead of time
  • he'll ask for a volunteer to read aloud, otherwise he'll randomly call on you
  • sometimes assign a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because all three reviews are consistent but the sample size is small and spans a wide time range.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL1A3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1