AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Felipe Agredano

Courses not reported · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and high-stakes writing with minimal support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo communicationConfusing instructionsTutor verification burdenFew high-stakes assignmentsHeavy essays
  • Reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with every quality rating at the lowest level.
  • Students repeatedly cite unclear instructions, missing communication, and delayed or .
  • Grades depend on few essay-heavy assignments, making unclear requirements especially risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Some students earn high grades, but the A requires navigating unclear , and tutor verification.

Online reviews show repeated unclear and stressful grading conditions, while the single .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course feels very difficult because , and students report little useful guidance.

Online evidence is extensive and consistently negative, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and the main requirement discussed is tutor .

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students strongly warn against the class because , and assignment structure are consistently criticized.

Both formats are negative, with online evidence much stronger because it includes 13 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Grading feels harsh because there are , and disputed tutor verification rules.

Format shift

, and the single in-person review also warns that few assignments can compromise the grade.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Students describe long essays, many , and tutor verification as stressful.

Format shift

The heavy workload pattern is strongest online, while the and verification.

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Students repeatedly say he does , and provides little useful feedback.

Format shift

Online reviews show a consistent communication failure, and the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

5/100

The class appears , and a small number of high-stakes assignments.

Format shift

Both formats describe assignment-heavy grading, with online reviews giving more detail about essays and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is also negative, citing tutor verification, few assignments, unclear expectations, and ungraded .

Main concern

With only four assignments, unclear expectations can heavily damage the grade.

What students said

“He requires so your grade could be compromised.”
82207
“Not very concise with what he wants.”
82207
“Offers but does not grade it”
82207

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews repeatedly describe poor communication, unclear essay instructions, tutor verification requirements, and .

Main concern

Students may receive little clarification or .

What students said

“The severe lack of communication in this course is outrageous.”
82207
“instructions didn't make sense, powerpoints didn't make sense”
82212
“This was one of the most stressful courses I have taken.”
82212

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a traditional exam format, and , and a .

No Clear Exam EvidenceEssays And Final Project MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and but does not clearly prove exam, midterm, or final format.

Four AssignmentsNo Clear Exam Evidence
“He requires so your grade could be compromised.”
82207

Online

Online reviews mention essays and a but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or .

EssaysFinal ProjectReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Proctoring
“3 essays, one final project.”
82212
“The entire class was made up of and .”
82212

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The severe lack of communication in this course is outrageous.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting , and workload; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“The severe lack of communication in this course is outrageous.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

0/100

“ .”

📚 Workload And Clarity

10/100

“ and long, and required tutor verifications for each assignment.”

Theme 1

📣 About Communication

  • He would NEVER respond .
  • .
  • and not a good teacher

Theme 2

📝 About Assignments

  • instructions didn't make sense, powerpoints didn't make sense
  • His assignment instructions are overly complicated and
  • too much writing and not organize.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • communication.
  • He requires so your grade could be compromised.
  • and the second/third papers were not graded until the week before the final paper during finals week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 reviews are recent, detailed, and overwhelmingly consistent, though .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 514

Course coverage

822078 reviews
822126 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4