AI Rate Professor

Geography

Stuart McFeeters

GEOG9 · GEO581254 · GEOG5 · GEOG05 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless you , and prepare heavily without much guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized LecturesTough TestsPoor CommunicationHeavy ReadingKnowledgeable But Ineffective
  • Students consistently describe him as knowledgeable and nice but very ineffective at teaching.
  • because lectures often ramble or miss tested material.
  • Getting a strong grade , and strict grading experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

An A looks very hard because students report , and low grades despite effort.

The online evidence highlights harsh paper grading, while and weak preparation.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The content is treated as hard because he assumes prior knowledge, uses advanced vocabulary, and moves into large concepts quickly.

In-person reviews provide most difficulty evidence, while the single online and communication than content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because one review warns that skipping class means you will not pass, but lectures are often described as low value.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

because teaching, communication, and test preparation are repeatedly criticized.

Both formats are negative, with and in-person focused on lectures and tests.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students report , and multiple low grades.

Format shift

Online evidence shows unexplained paper grading, while and strict outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention , and the need to prepare beyond lecture material.

Format shift

Workload , while the online review does not clearly describe workload volume.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

He is often called knowledgeable and nice, but students say lectures ramble, miss key material, and do not support learning.

Format shift

, while the online review mainly criticizes communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments emphasize detailed tests and one online paper complaint.

Format shift

, while the online review mentions a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly , and limited test preparation despite his subject knowledge.

Main concern

Lectures often do not prepare students for detailed tests.

What students said

“he doesn't give much material to study for ”
GEO581254
“Most of our class is currently failing.”
GEOG5
“he spends most of the class talking about things that have nothing to do with the lecture”
GEOG05

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review reports poor communication and a zero on a .

Main concern

No response to emails and .

What students said

“ ”
GEO581254
“he gave me a 0 on my paper with 0 feedback as to why”
GEO581254

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Detailed TestsLimited Study MaterialTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe detailed and difficult tests with limited preparation support, but .

Detailed TestsLimited Study MaterialTest Heavy
“Not much help given in preparing for .”
GEOG5
“he doesn't give much material to study for ”
GEO581254
“expects us to be prepared for tests even if the material doesn't reflect them”
GEOG5

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Those who want to learn this is not the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and test preparation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ accurately about on topic subjects.”

⚠️ Test Preparation

25/100

“Not much help given in preparing for .”

📉 Recommendation Risk

14/100

“Those who want to learn this is not the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he continuously yaps about random life stories during every lecture
  • Uses useless power points that will not exactly inform you at all.
  • he spends most of the class talking about things that have nothing to do with the lecture

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests And Grades

  • he doesn't give much material to study for
  • Most of our class is currently failing.
  • he gave me a 0 on my paper with 0 feedback as to why

Theme 3

📚 About Difficulty

  • starts of fast and with high vocabulary and large concepts
  • Attend every class, read the chapters, do the hw, and study guides to pass!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across many years are fairly consistent, but the online sample is only one review and several comments are older.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

GEO5812543 reviews
GEOG52 reviews
GEOG051 review
GEOG91 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values