AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Meaghan McCready

PSY5 · PSY2 · PSY16 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

McCready is worth taking if and online ambiguity, but if you need constant guidance on major projects.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesExtra creditClear criteria for many studentsOnline support concernsReading and exams
  • Most positive reviews , and .
  • Recent online reviews and delayed grading.
  • , and participate can do very well, but the experience is inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades are attainable with reading, participation, and , but and extensive exams require real effort.

Online grades benefit from but , while in person success depends on notes and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material is usually accessible and engaging, but reading load, exams, papers, and .

and assignment ambiguity, while in person reviews describe engaging lectures and test practice.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

as mandatory, but participation, group activities, and .

In person reviews emphasize showing up and participating, while and assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Many students love her engaging style, but several strongly negative reviews make the recommendation conditional.

In person evidence is mostly enthusiastic with one severe outlier, while online evidence is split between strong praise and recent frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

is frequent and grades are generally high, but and late grading create risk.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly mention but , while in person reviews tie strong grades to notes and participation.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload , and exams, but most successful students found it manageable.

Format shift

Online workload is heavier through reading and projects, while in person workload centers on lectures, notes, participation, and exams.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most students find her engaging and clear, but recent online complaints describe weak guidance and .

Format shift

Online teaching quality is polarized, while in person teaching is mostly praised except for one harsh negative review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment mixes , and exams rather than relying on one category.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, papers, discussions, and a , while in and group activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are mostly strong, praising lively lectures, participation, games, and .

Main concern

One in person student found the explanations and teaching style very poor.

What students said

“Her lectures are a 12/10 and if exams.”
PSY5
“Show up and participate and you will do well.”
PSY2
“ ", and a very self-serving style.”
PSY2

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with and fun coursework while two recent reviews describe .

Main concern

Major online assignments may feel underexplained and .

What students said

“If you are taking the online class be prepared to read a lot!”
Psy16
“There wasn't much explanation or help with .”
PSY5
“Professor McCready made lectures interesting and even used some memes to help keep things interesting”
PSY5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and assessment evidence suggests standard difficulty with extensive exam content, quizzes, a , and a video final, but .

Extensive ExamsStudy GuideBook QuizzesMidterm PaperVideo Final

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and group study activities, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Lecture-Based ExamsGroup Study Activities
“if exams.”
PSY5
“She often created group games and upcoming test.”
PSY2

Online

Online reviews , and a video final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Extensive ExamsStudy GuideBook QuizzesMidterm PaperVideo Final
“Her exams are extensive with what you have to learn and her study guide is a .”
Psy16
“ and the ”
PSY5
“you have to buy the book in order to do the if you read the chapter”
PSY5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall if you stay on top of assignments and put in effort, you will do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She makes everything enjoyable and interesting to where you actually feel like you are integrating your knowledge into what you are learning.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ .”

⚠️ Online Risk

45/100

“There wasn't much explanation or help with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor McCready made lectures interesting and even used some memes to help keep things interesting
  • Her lectures are a 12/10 and if exams.
  • Meaghan is very spunky and knows her stuff.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • If you are taking the online class be prepared to read a lot!
  • Amazing professor who offers extra credits from creating your own quiz questions for other students to answer in
  • Show up and participate and you will do well.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • .
  • She also does not grade until end of semester
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across 2020 to 2024 include detailed comments and reveal a consistent split between enthusiastic students and frustrated online students.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSY55 reviews
PSY23 reviews
Psy162 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1