AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Josiah Schletewitz

MATH1324 · MATH103 · MATH201 · MATH10A · MA10A · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you value a caring professor and can handle fast math lectures with extra independent practice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring teacherFast lecturesConfusing explanationsClear grading criteriaHomework-heavy
  • Students agree he cares and is accessible, but .
  • Grades can be fair because and , but success requires effort.
  • The experience varies by course and student learning style, with stronger results for students who ask questions and self-correct quickly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

An A is realistic for prepared students because tests can match reviews and partial credit exists, but and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The math content becomes challenging because several students say lectures move quickly and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Attendance appears important because notes, questions, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and accessibility, but many hesitate because his lectures can be rushed or confusing.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

because , and clear criteria, but not broad grade giveaways.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Workload varies, with some saying not much work and others reporting lots of .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

He is often described as caring and available, but repeated complaints about rushed or .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and showing work, with exams carrying strong importance.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but inconsistent math instructor whose lectures can be fast, confusing, or very helpful depending on the student.

Main concern

if they need slower math instruction.

What students said

“I found the tests difficult and the .”
MATH1324
“He cares about his students and their success.”
MATH201
“Flys through lectures, treats every chapter like its review”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are standard to moderately difficult, with some support from reviews and partial credit but .

Tests Like ReviewsHalf CreditDifficult TestsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

59/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and half credit, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or closed-book rules.

Tests Like ReviewsHalf CreditDifficult Tests
“I found the tests difficult and the .”
MATH1324
“the .”
MATH1324
“He does give half credit if you .”
MATH201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is overall a , but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and test difficulty. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“ . Terrible explainer.”

📈 Grade Effort

60/100

“Easy A if you try hard.”

❤️ Student Support

68/100

“He really does care if you pass, but its up to you to make the effort also!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He goes through the material really quickly, and typically it's .
  • Flys through lectures, treats every chapter like its review
  • He is very thorough during lectures.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • He cares about his students and their success.
  • You can call and even text him if
  • He answers everyone's question in class.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the .
  • He does give half credit if you .
  • Prof really cares that you actually know the material

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 11 mostly detailed in-person reviews show a and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2016 reviews
MATH13242 reviews
MA10A1 review
MATH1031 review
MATH10A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values