AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ryan Umar

CHEM3A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Ryan Umar is a solid choice if you want a and are willing to do steady work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear explanationsHelpful feedbackChemistry still takes workSome grading delays
  • Most students say Umar makes difficult chemistry more understandable and approachable.
  • The class is not effortless, but students who complete the work and prepare for .
  • One online review calls the class straightforward, while few serious complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

Grades seem reachable with , and use of feedback, but students warn that you will not pass without studying.

Online evidence says the class is straightforward, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Chemistry is still challenging, but several students say Umar makes the material easier to understand.

Online evidence calls the course straightforward, while as difficult chemistry made more manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students recommend Umar because , and makes chemistry easier to understand.

Online evidence is mildly positive, while negative reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students mention opportunities to improve grades, but one complaint describes a and delayed gradebook updates.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited, while and frustration with grading practices.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The , and test preparation, but most comments describe it as manageable.

Format shift

The online review lists weekly work explicitly, while and preparing for tests.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and ability to make chemistry understandable, despite a few complaints.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive but notes mistakes, while and mostly praises clarity and support.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Students mention labs, homework, lecture problems, pop quizzes, tests, and weight.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes labs and lecture problems, while , and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

support, and clearer chemistry explanations, though a minority criticize grading delays and teaching enthusiasm.

Main concern

Students still need to study and complete the work, and .

What students said

“She makes a difficult class much easier to understand and do.”
CHEM3A
“If you don't actually do the work and study you absolutely won't pass.”
CHEM3A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review says the class was straightforward but and lecture work and .

Main concern

Weekly work can pile up, and lecture mistakes may confuse students.

What students said

“This class was not hard to do online and it was pretty straightforward.”
CHEM3A
“She often made mistakes when doing the problems in the lecture”
CHEM3A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, pop quizzes, and a , but do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, or proctoring.

TestsRetake RulePop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a , but do not clearly prove exam security rules.

TestsRetake RulePop Quizzes
“Just do all the work and prepare for tests and you will be fine.”
CHEM3A
“for the retake, we had to get a 83% or better or else we will get our original grade.”
CHEM3A

Online

The online review does not clearly describe exam format, webcam use, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes a difficult class much easier to understand and do.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She makes a difficult class much easier to understand and do.”

👍 Recommendation Level

74/100

“You can tell the teacher really cares about her students and gives every opportunity for students to improve their grades.”

📈 Grade Effort

63/100

“If you don't actually do the work and study you absolutely won't pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes chemistry easy to understand and more fun than you'd think
  • Professor Umar , and made herself approachable to students.
  • She often made mistakes when doing the problems in the lecture, so it made it a .

Theme 2

📚 About Effort And Difficulty

  • This class was not hard to do online and it was pretty straightforward.
  • If you don't actually do the work and study you absolutely won't pass.
  • Just do all the work and prepare for tests and you will be fine.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • This professor never puts anything in the gradebook until weeks later.
  • She talks like she doesn't want to teach.
  • for the retake, we had to get a 83% or better or else we will get our original grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 7 reviews provide useful but limited evidence across online and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM3A7 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values