AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Michelle Johnson

PSYCH2 · PSY2 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can tolerate inconsistent teaching and weak communication for a potentially manageable Psych 2 grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInconsistent TeachingSlow GradingPoor CommunicationEasy If Engaged
  • Reviews are highly mixed, with one strong positive review and several serious complaints.
  • The online and .
  • Older in-person reviews , and classroom value.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

One in-person student says she is a pushover for grades, but the and no timely manual grades.

The easy-grade evidence is from in-person reviews, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Psych 2 itself does not sound conceptually extreme, but and distracting opinions can make it harder.

Online evidence focuses on course management, while learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation is risky because praise for teaching and communication.

Online evidence is negative on communication, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but the online review calls her a and reports delayed grade entry.

Format shift

, while online evidence is negative and limited.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews do not describe a heavy workload, but the online student struggled with grade uncertainty.

Format shift

Neither format gives strong workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching feedback ranges from great explanations to severe complaints about lacking teaching ability.

Format shift

In-person reviews conflict strongly, while the online review focuses more on responsiveness than lecture quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , though Canvas auto-graded work is mentioned online.

Format shift

Online mentions Canvas-graded items, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

complaints and one strong praise for clear explanations and easy grading.

Main concern

Teaching quality appears inconsistent across older reviews.

What students said

“She is the !!”
PSYCH2
“She's very good at explaining things too!”
PSYCH2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and communication were major problems.

Main concern

Grades were not updated and messages were not answered.

What students said

“only grades that are inserted are the ”
PSY2
“ ”
PSY2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , open-book, quiz, midterm, or final policies.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a great teacher. She loves pyschology, and makes it interesting.. She is a pushover which makes it easy to get a good grade!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She's very good at explaining things too!”

⚠️ Communication Risk

35/100

“ ”

📈 Grade Experience

62/100

“She is a pushover which makes it easy to get a good grade!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is the !!
  • She is a great teacher.
  • She's very good at explaining things too!

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • only grades that are inserted are the
  • She is a pushover which makes it easy to get a good grade!

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • her opinions conflict too much with learning psych-2

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and opinions are inconsistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSY22 reviews
PSYCH22 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values