AI Rate Professor

Art

Tracy Teran

ART81014 · ART5 · ART1 · ART2 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
58.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

She is a reasonable choice for students who want manageable art classes, but and participation demands.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy ALecture heavyLow homeworkMixed attitude concernsClear grading
  • Online reviews are very positive and describe a flexible, almost guaranteed A if work is completed.
  • and tests but frequent complaints about boring lectures and attitude.
  • , but in-class activities and lecture content can matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A appears easy if , and keep up with simple tests.

Online reviews are strongly Easy A, while but and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Most ART2 content is described as simple, though Art History and memorization-heavy sections can feel denser.

Online reviews describe simple pacing, while and occasional dense material.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Attendance ranges from flexible to important because and activities happen only in class.

Online work is self-paced, while in-person reviews conflict and missing class hurting performance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and art knowledge, but attitude, boring lectures, and organization issues create hesitation.

, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are often high and several students call the class an Easy A, though .

Format shift

Online grading sounds very generous, while but less consistent.

Workload

Light

78/100

, but , and in-class activities still require steady attention.

Format shift

Online workload is flexible and simple, while but tied to class participation.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

She can be knowledgeable, caring, and engaging, but many students , and condescension.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessments include tests, papers, participation, museum or field assignments, and occasional in-class activities.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and , but lecture-heavy classes, attitude issues, and some required in-class work.

Main concern

Some students .

What students said

“ , and amazing opportunities to go on field trips.”
ART2
“ , but .”
ART2
“Teran was terrible. There's lecture every class, which is fine but .”
ART2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe a simple, flexible class with and a short grace period.

Main concern

There is little negative online evidence, but the sample is small.

What students said

“Literally just do the work and you will get a guaranteed A.”
ART2
“Professor Teran assigns all assignments at the beginning of the semester so you can work at your own pace.”
ART2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually described as simple or memorization-based, but reviews do not .

Simple testsStudy guide mentionedFour tests mentionedPolicy unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, but do not clearly establish exam rules or .

Simple testsStudy guide ahead of timeFour tests mentioned
“ , and amazing opportunities to go on field trips.”
ART2
“4 tests throughout the year and she posts a study guide ahead of time.”
ART2

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, webcam rules, open-book rules, or .

Policy unclear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Literally just do the work and you will get a guaranteed A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Potential

86/100

“Easy A, hardly any work.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“She's a great teacher and knows how to talk about art and make others understand what's going on.”

⚠️ Lecture Experience

58/100

“Boring lecture pretty much every class period.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Literally just do the work and you will get a guaranteed A.
  • Easy A, hardly any work.
  • The work and if you pay attention & participate.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She kept lectures very interesting, and was very compassionate when I had to miss a test.
  • Her lectures are so boring that I wanted to fall asleep.
  • She knows what she's talking about.

Theme 3

🕒 And Workload

  • , but .
  • Showing up to class is a must where she often gives assignments in class that you cannot make up for later.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed and consistent , and attendance.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART213 reviews
ART52 reviews
ART11 review
ART810141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1