AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Marcia Hollenbeck

INTERALGEBRA · MATH103 · INTALGEBRA · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if math is a weakness and , but stay present and keep up with assignments.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyBeginner friendlyClear explanationsHelpfulExtra creditAttendance important
  • Most students say she makes math easier to understand, especially for students who struggle with the subject.
  • Grades are very attainable with , and studying, with and flexible homework policies helping.
  • A few reviews mention issues with , and occasional rudeness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students repeatedly earned A grades and describe the class as easy , and use .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students who dislike or struggle with and approachable.

Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as important for passing, but reviews do not prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, though a minority report organization and attitude issues.

Recommendation and is mostly positive with a few reservations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and many A grades suggest lenient grading for students who communicate and work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

Homework and notes are expected, but students often describe the class as easy, breezy, or manageable.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students praise her clear explanations and helpfulness, while a and occasional rudeness.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and , so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly describe a helpful, clear, beginner-friendly math teacher with manageable tests and useful .

Main concern

Some students report , and occasional difficulty approaching her.

What students said

“I always struggled with math and I had a super easy time in this class.”
MATH103
“ and .”
103
“ though!”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

TestsQuizzesExtra Credit On Some Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests, quizzes, and , but .

TestsQuizzesExtra Credit On Some Tests
“ and tests.”
MATH103
“ was offered on some of the tests as well as assignments.”
INTERALGEBRA

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if math is difficult for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ and .”

📈 Easy A Potential

84/100

“I always struggled with math and I had a super easy time in this class.”

⚖️

82/100

“She gave lots of and also HW but would let you redo and submit late if you specifically asked.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and thorough and very quick.
  • She explained things easily and she was always there when I had questions to clarify for me.
  • She takes her time in explanation.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I HATE math but if you and study for .
  • The !
  • was offered on some of the tests as well as assignments.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Lectures were short and when you went home to do the of the material.
  • Occasionally rude.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine in-person reviews across several years provide consistent detail, despite some older dates and a few mixed experiences.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1036 reviews
1031 review
INTALGEBRA1 review
INTERALGEBRA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values