AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Franc Pelayo

CSCI41 · CS41 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Take Franc Pelayo if you can handle difficult programming work and actively seek help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardChallenging AssignmentsAccessible Outside ClassStrict GradingHelpful With CodeMixed Student Experience
  • Reviews are split between strong praise for help and serious complaints about support.
  • as difficult and sometimes hard to research independently.
  • Students who use his help and resubmission opportunities can still earn strong grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Good grades are possible through resubmissions and improvement, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

as challenging, hard to research, and difficult to complete without help.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

30/100

One tag says skipping class hurts success, but comments do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Two students recommend him for help and feedback, while and poor support.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Strict grading is reported, but resubmissions and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Assignments are repeatedly described as challenging and difficult to solve independently.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

and one severe complaint about help and care.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mainly discuss programming assignments, resubmissions, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

difficult assignments, mixed support experiences, and possible reward for persistence.

Main concern

, and support experiences vary.

What students said

“The but he is easy to contact for help.”
CS41
“ ”
CSCI41
“He allows you to resubmit your programming assignments no matter what grade you had as long as it was submitted.”
CSCI41

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes but do not .

Pop Quizzes MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove the broader exam policy.

Pop Quizzes MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The but he is easy to contact for help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Not as elegant as Kerney but does a good job explaining concepts.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

55/100

“He allows you to resubmit your programming assignments no matter what grade you had as long as it was submitted.”

⚖️ Workload Pressure

25/100

“ to help solve your problem or help you code your program.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not as elegant as Kerney but does a good job explaining concepts.
  • His availability outside of class far surpasses any other professor I've ever had.
  • Doesn't care for his students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The but he is easy to contact for help.
  • Franc says himself he values seeing you improve on your mistakes over the grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only three reviews, but they contain specific details and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CSCI412 reviews
CS411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values