AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Adrian Barton-Muller

PHIL1C · WS10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Take this professor if you want an and can keep up with reading and short papers.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHighly recommendedReading heavyInteractive classPassionate teachingExtra credit
  • Students strongly recommend Adrian and describe the class as enjoyable and passionate.
  • The class is easy to earn an A in, but students should expect lots of reading and papers.
  • Participation matters because lack of engagement can lead to impatience or quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Both students earned A grades, and one says the class is as easy as it can be, though reading and .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The course feels approachable because students call it easy, but the .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as mandatory, but interaction and participation appear important.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend Adrian because the class is enjoyable, engaging, and taught with dedication.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Both reviewers earned A grades, and is mentioned, but the , and possible quizzes.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload includes lots of , and possible quizzes.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students , and overall class experience.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

and possible quizzes rather than exam-dominated.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe an enjoyable, easy, and and writing.

Main concern

The main concern is keeping up with frequent reading and participation.

What students said

“I've been recommending them to everyone!”
WS10
“Mx. Barton makes the class just as easy as it can be.”
PHIL1C
“LOTS of reading and a couple of short papers, but overall loved the class and loved the dedication and passion from Adrian.”
WS10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and possible quizzes, so the exam risk appears standard.

One MidtermPapersPossible Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention one midterm, three papers, and possible quizzes, but .

One MidtermThree PapersPossible Quizzes
“Only 1 midterm and 3 papers.”
PHIL1C
“ the class doesn't read the readings.”
PHIL1C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've been recommending them to everyone!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“I've been recommending them to everyone!”

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“overall loved the class and loved the dedication and passion from Adrian.”

📚 Workload Reality

58/100

“LOTS of reading and a couple of short papers”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Also loves to interact with the class a lot.
  • overall loved the class and loved the dedication and passion from Adrian.
  • Mx. Barton does get a little impatient from lack of class participation.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Mx. Barton makes the class just as easy as it can be.
  • Only 1 midterm and 3 papers.
  • the class doesn't read the readings.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only two older reviews, but they are consistent and include useful course details.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1C1 review
WS101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values