AI Rate Professor

English

Erin Conn

ENG1A81645 · ENGL1A · ENG1A · ENGLISH1A · ENGLISH125 · ECON125 · ENG125 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
26.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want intense writing practice and , and heavy weekly work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadTough graderSlow gradingLots of readingUseful feedback
  • Most students describe a heavy workload with , and deadlines.
  • The strongest recurring complaint is delayed grading, which makes it hard to know where students stand.
  • A and structure can improve writing if students tolerate the workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

exists and some students earned A grades, but most comments say the workload and .

Online evidence is positive but only one review, while and heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

33/100

The course is intellectually demanding mainly because of , and .

Online evidence only says she prepares students well, while and paper difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and attendance is needed to pass.

; the single online review does not mention attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

27/100

Most students would not retake her because the workload, grading delays, and .

The only online review recommends her, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students repeatedly call her a and complain that grades are late or unexplained.

Format shift

Strict grading , while the online review mentions but lacks detail.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of reading, annotating, papers, homework, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention homework, but the workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

, but many students describe poor pacing, delayed grades, apathy, and .

Format shift

The online review is positive, while in-person reviews are mostly negative with a .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears dominated by essays, journals, annotations, papers, and peer editing rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and in-person evidence point toward assignment-heavy work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and writing, delayed grades, tough grading, and unclear paper expectations.

Main concern

Students often feel overloaded and unsure of their grades until very late.

What students said

“ .”
ENGL1A
“it was very difficult to finish all the work she gave on time.”
ENG1A81645
“Super frustrating to not know where you stand in a class grade wise.”
ENGLISH1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive and says she prepares students well, though it still tags the class as homework-heavy.

Main concern

The online evidence is too thin to judge beyond one positive but workload-heavy report.

What students said

“Great teacher that will prepare any student for their 1A.”
ECON125
“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”
ECON125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on papers, annotations, and .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ papers”
ENG1A
“She ”
ENG125

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please save yourself from this professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“it was very difficult to finish all the work she gave on time.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ , but it was very difficult to finish all the work she gave on time.”

⚖️

22/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

27/100

“ !”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Yes this teacher has a lot of reading, writing and annotating.
  • Gives out lots of work and cant keep up with .
  • Lots of due every week.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Professor Conn did not grade most of my work until AFTER I had finished the .
  • Grades are hardly posted on time.
  • My first F Ive ever received on an .

Theme 3

🧑‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Youre basically learning from your peers not her.
  • She makes class fun and interactive.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 15 reviews across several terms show , and grading strictness.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1254 reviews
ENGL1A4 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ENGLISH1252 reviews
ECON1251 review
Show 2 more courses
ENG1A816451 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2