AI Rate Professor

English

Erin Fujinami

ENG1A · ENGL3 · ENGL125 · ENG3 · ENG125 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless , and strict grading on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderUnclear InstructionsHeavy WorkloadClass CancellationsMany Papers
  • Most reviews describe unclear instructions, missed or shortened classes, and weak organization.
  • Students repeatedly call her a , and extra work.
  • One older positive review says an English class was easier than most, but it is outweighed by later negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few students passed, but , and heavy work make an A costly.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content and assignments feel harder because and workload is high.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One review says skipping class means you will not pass, and another says students lose points for not having everything in class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students would not take her again because of , and .

All , and it is strongly negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Multiple reviews directly call her a and say missing class materials costs points.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Reviews mention lots of , and unrelated work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students often describe unclear instructions, poor communication, missed classes, and low engagement.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments emphasize , and class preparation rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly , and frequent class disruptions.

Main concern

The main concern is poor organization combined with and heavy workload.

What students said

“She would constantly cancel class, or leave early.”
ENG3
“ and concise, in fact they are the exact opposite.”
ENGL3
“There is too much non-related much work!”
ENGL125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , midterm format, final format, or closed-book policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and concise, in fact they are the exact opposite.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ and concise, in fact they are the exact opposite.”

⚖️

18/100

“Fujinamji is a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“There is too much non-related much work!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and concise, in fact they are the exact opposite.
  • She would constantly cancel class, or leave early.
  • Just bad

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Fujinamji is a .
  • be prepared to need clarification on everything she says and receive a B in the class.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There is too much non-related much work!
  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six in-person reviews across several terms show consistent concerns, though some are older and grade data is incomplete.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1252 reviews
ENG1A1 review
ENG31 review
ENGL1251 review
ENGL31 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values