AI Rate Professor

English

James Flanagen

ENG1A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you and inconsistent feedback, especially online.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderUneven FeedbackHeavy ReadingHigh DifficultyPolarizing Teaching
  • , and no essay feedback.
  • and says the class improved writing skills.
  • Evidence is old and split across only two reviews, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because the online student reported , and .

The online , while the but does not prove easier grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course appears challenging because reviews , and serious writing development.

, while in-person evidence frames the challenge as intellectually useful.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

Neither online nor in-person evidence clearly proves an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is weak because the online review is strongly .

, while the but old.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

The clearest grading evidence says he is a and .

Format shift

The ; the in-person review does not discuss grades.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The online review tags lots of homework and reading, while the .

Format shift

Workload concerns come from the online review only.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching feedback is polarized, with one review praising learning and another calling the experience .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only assessment evidence centers on essays and writing rather than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions essays; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and says the class substantially improved writing skills.

Main concern

The course still appears intellectually demanding.

What students said

“I've learned more about writing a simple sentence in this class than any other class.”
ENG1A
“intellectually simulating and easy to talk to.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review is , and no useful feedback.

Main concern

Students may receive .

What students said

“never gave me feedback on any of .”
ENG1A
“he is a ”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book status, or final exam style.

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam Policy Unclear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“never gave me feedback on any of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“I've learned more about writing a simple sentence in this class than any other class.”

⚖️

22/100

“he is a ”

👍 Recommendation Risk

38/100

“Horrible”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I've learned more about writing a simple sentence in this class than any other class.
  • intellectually simulating and easy to talk to.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he is a
  • never gave me feedback on any of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and the online and in-person experiences conflict sharply.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values