AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tikiri Amarasinghe

MATH205 · MATH6 · MATH301 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesLots of homeworkMandatory attendanceNeeds self-studyAccessible outside class
  • Students describe her as kind and sometimes detailed, but lectures are often scattered and error-prone.
  • Getting a good grade appears possible, but , and outside support.
  • , and students repeatedly mention high effort for a low-quality learning experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but comments , and outside support rather than relying on instruction.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Some students say the material itself is not hard, but make the class feel much harder.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Attendance appears strict because one and warns skipping hurts passing.

, and no online attendance evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students would not recommend her because the and .

The and mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades do not seem impossible, but students credit their own .

Format shift

and .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and extra time needed to keep up.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students describe fast speech, frequent errors, scattered lectures, and poor organization despite her being kind.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize homework, online homework, studying, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but disorganized math instructor whose classes require heavy self-study.

Main concern

because of mistakes, topic jumping, and poor time management.

What students said

“She makes tons of mistakes, jumps all around different topics.”
MATH6
“I walked away from this course with an A, 100% due to my own diligence.”
MATH205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the open-book or closed-book.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and studying but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy
“Do all the homework. Study. Go to SISsessions.”
MATH6

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I walked away from this course with an A, 100% due to my own diligence.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting teaching, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She makes tons of mistakes, jumps all around different topics.”

📚 Workload

20/100

“Do all the homework. Study. Go to SISsessions. And dedicate lots of time to this Class.”

👍 Recommendation

25/100

“ time with math.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Amarsinghe talks pretty fast(high pitch) but the lectures aren't hard to understand.
  • She , and terrible with time management.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Overall the class wasn't difficult.
  • I walked away from this course with an A, 100% due to my own diligence.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • And dedicate lots of time to this Class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across several math courses give consistent concerns, but the comments are old and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH62 reviews
MATH2051 review
MATH3011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2