AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

David Burks

MATH250 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are willing to , and tolerate uneven teaching.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy HomeworkTough TestsInconsistent TeachingExtra CreditAttendance Matters
  • Students agree the workload is heavy and .
  • Teaching quality is sharply mixed, with one student finding him workable and .
  • and an , but grading and organization create risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Passing is possible through attendance, work completion, and , but an A looks costly because homework and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is , and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Students explicitly warn that skipping class makes passing unlikely.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation is split because one student valued the eventual leniency while and lost work.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students call him a tough grader, though and an .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

may not always be graded.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching is mixed but weakened by a direct complaint that .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final, with no single method clearly dominating.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews , and mixed teaching quality.

Main concern

The main risk is heavy work with and .

What students said

“ , but at the end ended up being very chill.”
MATH250
“Not good at explaining how to perform math functions”
MATH250

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and an easier final, but they do not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring, or .

Tough TestsEasier FinalExtra Credit Before Final

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final graded easier than other tests, but no clear exam policy is proven.

Tough TestsEasier Final
“ ”
MATH250
“He graded the ”
MATH250

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Basically be there, turn in your work and you'll pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Not good at explaining how to perform math functions”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“ ”

⚖️

35/100

“ ”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not good at explaining how to perform math functions
  • at the end ended up being very chill

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • He graded the
  • Basically be there, turn in your work and you'll pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they conflict strongly on the overall experience.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2502 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values