AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Adam Smith

PE7 · PSY16 · HLTH188400 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you value an , but be cautious with online health sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed student experienceHelpful in personRude onlineEasy PE courseUnclear test alignment
  • In-person reviews describe him as helpful and easy to follow, especially in PE.
  • Online health reviews are mixed, with one harsh complaint about attitude and .
  • The evidence is old and sparse, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The in-person PE class sounds very easy, but and coursework alignment issues and one recorded C.

Online evidence suggests more effort and confusion, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The PE content appears easy and fun, while online health may feel harder because tests and coursework do not match the textbook cleanly.

In-person comments make the course sound easier than the online comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students liked him in person but the online comments include serious concerns about attitude and course alignment.

online reviewers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

but less predictable online because one student said tests did not match the textbook.

Format shift

In-person grading sounds easier, while .

Workload

Light

72/100

The PE class sounds low effort, and there is no strong evidence of heavy workload across the small sample.

Format shift

, while as easy and fun.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching and a harsh online complaint about not caring.

Format shift

Online teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention coursework and tests online but give little detail about assessment weighting overall.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests and coursework, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are positive, describing the PE course as easy and fun and the instructor as helpful and real with students.

Main concern

The and mostly from older PE or psychology comments.

What students said

“GOlf PE really easy, fun.”
PE7
“ .”
PSY16

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with one student calling him rude and another saying coursework and .

Main concern

Online students may get unclear explanations or poor support when expectations feel inconsistent.

What students said

“very rude, this guy is whats wrong with our education system”
HLTH188400
“the coursework and ”
HLTH188400

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Tests mentionedExam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or final structure.

Online

, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, webcam rules, or final format.

Tests did not match textbook
“ ”
HLTH188400

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ .”

⚠️ Online Concern

50/100

“the coursework and ”

📈 Course Ease

67/100

“GOlf PE really easy, fun.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • very rude, this guy is whats wrong with our education system

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • GOlf PE really easy, fun.
  • the coursework and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and the comments are split by format with limited assessment detail.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HLTH1884002 reviews
PE71 review
PSY161 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values