Shantel Thornton

PSY1 · PSY81480 · PSY81499 · PSY2 · GENPSY1 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 37/100
RMP rating: 2.3/5
Take again: 100%
Difficulty: 3.2

The decision

if you can manage deadlines and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesLate gradingPoor email responseEasy but unclearNotes allowed on exams

Many students say the class can be easy, but expectations, deadlines, lectures, and .
The strongest complaints focus , and slow or .
Exam evidence is mixed, with notes allowed in but other tests described as deeper than the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades can be high because the course is often easy, but , and deeper-than-expected tests add real risk.

Online reviews describe an easy discussion-board class with delayed support, while and self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material is not consistently hard, but disorganized lectures and the content itself.

Online content sounds easier, while and uneven.

Is attendance flexible?

Avoid

35/100

Despite a few positive comments, most reviews warn about , and unclear expectations.

, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Students earned several high grades, but grading delays and than clearly generous.

Format shift

Online and support.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The , and exams, with some busywork but no consistent claim of overwhelming volume.

Format shift

Online reviews mention twice-weekly discussion boards, while , and syllabus tracking.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Most comments describe unfocused , and weak communication despite a few positive experiences.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mixed, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Students mention exams, papers, discussion boards, assignments, and syllabus-based due dates.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussion boards and papers, while , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative about organization, relevance, grading delays, and , though some students say the course is easy and .

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves because lectures can be unfocused and .

What students said

“You basically teach yourself the material”
PSY2

“Doesn't inform you or .”
PSY1

“Very easy course but ”
PSY2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with one very positive personal support comment but and .

Main concern

Online students may .

What students said

“10/10 would recommend her to everyone!”
GENPSY1

“ .”
PSY2

“She was not very helpful or .”
PSY2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies because , but as poorly aligned or more in depth than expected.

One page of notes allowedTests not like study guidesDeeper tests than readingsFinal access issue

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly mention one page of notes allowed on exams, but and lectures.

One page of notes allowedTests not like study guidesQuestions from Internet

“You're also allowed one page of notes for exams.”
PSY2

“ ”
PSY81499

“Questions from first 3 exams were off the Internet”
PSY2

Online

Online reviews say tests are not too bad in one section, but and the ; they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam rules, open-book rules, or Lockdown Browser use.

Tests not too badDeeper tests than readingsFinal access issue

“ ”
PSY2

“the the reading”
PSY2

“No one was able to access the exam until 3 days late”
PSY2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“You basically teach yourself the material and .”
Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ .”

⚠️ Communication Risk

35/100

“ .”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

68/100

“Very easy course but ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She teaches off of slides and goes off topic a lot.
Gets through a page of lecture notes per hour.
.

Theme 2

📬

.
doesn't grade things on time and .

Theme 3

📝

You're also allowed one page of notes for exams.
Very easy course but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across online and in-person formats give detailed and mostly consistent , and exams.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 51

3 out of 52

2 out of 53

1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSY26 reviews

GENPSY11 review

PSY11 review

PSY814801 review

PSY814991 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

A 3 · A- 1

B range

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

C- 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Shantel Thornton

x x x if you can manage deadlines and x x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Recommended

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚠️ Communication Risk

📈 Difficulty & Grades

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📬 x x x x

📝 x x x x

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you can manage deadlines and .

📬

📝