AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Santanu Banerjee

CSCI40 · CSCI112 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself programming and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear explanationsNot helpfulHarsh computer gradingIntro-unfriendlyDrop risk
  • All reviews rate the teaching experience extremely poorly.
  • Students say and support is weak or absent.
  • Computer-graded exams with no partial credit make mistakes costly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Passing is possible for some students, but getting an A looks difficult because and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Intro programming feels harder than expected because students say instructions and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and none clearly state an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students consistently warn against him because , and poorly suited to teaching beginners.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and no partial credit make .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and exams than workload, so workload itself is not clearly proven as overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Every review gives the lowest quality rating and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The clearest assessment evidence centers on a and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe unclear teaching, weak support, and punishing assessment in computer science courses.

Main concern

because explanations and help are described as poor.

What students said

“He has no passion at teaching.”
CSCI112
“If you have just a little mistake, then .”
CSCI112
“cannot be any less clearer, and ”
CSCI40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because comments describe a computer-graded Blackboard midterm with no partial credit for small mistakes.

Blackboard MidtermComputer-Graded AnswersNo Partial CreditHarsh Point Loss

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

computer with no partial credit, while other exam policies are not clearly proven.

Blackboard MidtermComputer-Graded AnswersNo Partial Credit
“the .”
CSCI112
“It mean computer will grade your answer.”
CSCI112
“There is no partial credit for your answer.”
CSCI112

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took his class for 3 weeks then dropped it. cannot be any less clearer, and so he compensates this with his analogies, making it even harder.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“He has no passion at teaching.”

⚖️

15/100

“If you have just a little mistake, then .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

8/100

“Just no.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is more like to get an honer as a professor. He has no passion at teaching.
  • cannot be any less clearer, and
  • In his and explain some typical examples which book already provided.

Theme 2

📈

  • It mean computer will grade your answer.
  • There is no partial credit for your answer.
  • If you have just a little mistake, then .

Theme 3

🧭 About Student Support

  • NOT HELPFUL.
  • I was having problem with , but .
  • gives instructions without even telling you what your doing and what your supposed to do.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed enough and consistently negative.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CSCI1123 reviews
CSCI401 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1