AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charles Dunworth

MATH11 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are prepared to teach yourself from the textbook and handle a heavy workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes Not TeachTextbook DependentOverwhelming HomeworkHarsh Structure
  • Students describe very weak teaching with little structured instruction.
  • The , and weekend homework beyond math work.
  • Both reviews report very high difficulty and poor outcomes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and low outcomes.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course is described as comprehensive, reading-heavy, writing-heavy, and extremely difficult.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person MATH11 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly criticize the lack of , and exhausting workload.

Recommendation and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Grades appear unforgiving because one student earned a C and another withdrew despite heavy required work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Students describe long weekends of and broad non-math requirements.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload, and .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say he lacks a teaching agenda, does not teach clearly, and was unprepared with the textbook.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize homework, textbook dissection, shown work, writing, and comprehensive class demands more than exams.

Format shift

but do not clearly describe exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and very heavy workload.

Main concern

Students say he does not teach enough and relies heavily on the textbook.

What students said

“He does not teach, and doesn't even finish them.”
MATH11
“Be prepared for long weekends of .”
MATH11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or final exam policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He does not teach, and doesn't even finish them.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“This professor does not have a teaching agenda.”

📚 Workload Pressure

8/100

“Be prepared for long weekends of .”

⚠️ Course Risk

5/100

“If you end up taking this class, be prepared to dissect your textbook.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does not teach, and doesn't even finish them.
  • This professor does not have a teaching agenda.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • The format for the class is extremely difficult.
  • Be prepared for long weekends of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH112 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1