AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Kelly Eichmann

FN35 · HLTHHLTH · HEALTH1 · FN40 · NUTRITION40 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are highly interested in the subject and , and a polarizing classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard TestsHeavy ProjectsPersonal TangentsHarsh GradingPolarizing Personality
  • Reviews are sharply divided, but the negative comments are frequent and intense.
  • Students repeatedly complain , and excessive personal talk.
  • A few students say she is passionate and worthwhile if students put in effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A appears possible, but students , and grading that demands significant effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course feels difficult because , and assignments are time-consuming.

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly described as mandatory, but one review says a .

, and the policy is not clearly proven.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most negative reviews warn against the class because of , and a frustrating teaching style.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Several students say she grades hard and tests are extremely difficult, though one older review calls the scale fair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students describe numerous projects, papers, diet analysis, and heavy studying as time-consuming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students praise her passion, but many describe , personal tangents, insults, and poor approachability.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and diet analysis, so the course appears mixed but test-heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and often frustrating course, though some students respect her passion and .

Main concern

Students most often , and personal or argumentative lectures.

What students said

“ .”
FN40
“ unless plan on cutting out an ungodly amount of time to the and studying for her tests.”
FN40
“She is passionate about nutrition.”
FN35

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but do not clearly prove book policy, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Extremely Hard Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely hard, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Extremely Hard Tests
“ .”
FN40
“Entire class struggled with tests, with scores ranging from 60-80.”
FN40
“studying for her tests.”
FN40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless plan on cutting out an ungodly amount of time to the and studying for her tests.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in exams, workload, and teaching style. Credibility rating: High.

🧪

28/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“ unless plan on cutting out an ungodly amount of time to the and studying for her tests.”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She knows the material and seems passionate about it.”

Theme 1

🧪 About Tests And Grades

  • .
  • Entire class struggled with tests, with scores ranging from 60-80.
  • Grades very hard and is not easy to approch for help.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Diet analysis time consuming-start early on it
  • and studying for her tests
  • Makes everything 10 times harder than it really is.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is passionate about nutrition.
  • and she often contradicted the info in the book.
  • talks too much about her personal life and can be argumentative.
  • Was a good teacher if you are willing to put in the effort!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

detail and consistent recurring complaints despite some disagreement.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 56
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FN404 reviews
HEALTH14 reviews
FN351 review
HLTHHLTH1 review
NUTRITION401 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1