AI Rate Professor

Management

William Kidd

COTR19G · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Take this course if you want a low-stress work experience setup with flexibility around completing required hours.

Best fit · Effort For RewardVery accommodatingGenerous with requirementsLow involvementWork experience focused
  • The only review describes a very easy, low-contact work experience course.
  • The professor was generous about helping students complete required hours.
  • Evidence is positive but thin because it .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

The A+ came with very low difficulty, and the professor helped students avoid failing by offering ways to complete required hours.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

The course appears structurally simple because it is a work experience class with limited professor involvement.

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

80/100

, but required work hours appear flexible when students fall short.

The only evidence is from an in-person work experience review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

The review is strongly positive because the professor was generous and accommodating when students needed help meeting course requirements.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

The professor gave students extra ways to complete required hours instead of failing them.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

The course is described as low-contact and easy, with no heavy workload mentioned.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from the in-person review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

The professor is praised for being accommodating, though the course gives little direct teaching exposure.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears based on completing work experience hours rather than exams.

Format shift

The in-person review discusses quotas and volunteering opportunities, not tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and describes an accommodating instructor in a low-involvement work experience class.

Main concern

The professor may not be very present because the course structure limits direct involvement.

What students said

“he's very accommodating about students who have yet to meet their quota”
COTR19G

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he's very accommodating about students who have yet to meet their quota”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in support and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Support

88/100

“he's very accommodating about students who have yet to meet their quota”

⚖️

95/100

“offering volunteering opportunities to fill up hours that would have failed a student otherwise”

📉 Course Difficulty

95/100

“I didn't see him much throughout my Work Experience class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Instructor Involvement

  • I didn't see him much throughout my Work Experience class
  • he's not really involved in the lives of students

Theme 2

📈 About Requirements & Grades

  • he's very accommodating about students who have yet to meet their quota
  • offering volunteering opportunities to fill up hours that would have failed a student otherwise

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review, even though it is specific and positive.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COTR19G1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values