AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lynette Cortez Chavez

TRIG · MATH103 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you already know the math well and can teach yourself through a difficult structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing teachingHard to passInconsistent gradingNote-heavyNo calculator
  • Students say the and mostly note-taking.
  • Passing feels difficult because exams and study guides may not align well.
  • as weird, inconsistent, and restrictive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A looks very hard because students report , and difficulty passing.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The material is made harder by limited examples, long note-taking sessions, and complicated passing conditions.

All course-difficulty evidence is from in-person classes only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Students warn against taking her because the , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students describe grading as weird and inconsistent, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Class time is described as long, tiring, and dominated by chapter notes with few worked examples.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say she cannot teach the material and spends too much time on notes instead of problem solving.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews emphasize tests, study guides, and calculator restrictions more than assignments.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a difficult, note-heavy math class with weak instruction and .

Main concern

Students may struggle to learn and pass without strong prior math preparation.

What students said

“she can't teach her material.”
TRIG
“ and inconsistent.”
TRIG
“You may not use a calculator in tests or in class.”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because students report no calculator use and study guides that do not match exams.

No CalculatorStudy Guide MismatchTests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

calculator use and poor study-guide alignment.

No CalculatorStudy Guide MismatchTests Mentioned
“You may not use a calculator in tests or in class.”
MATH103
“her study guide does not go with exams.”
TRIG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you've never taken trig”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“she can't teach her material.”

⚖️

20/100

“ and inconsistent.”

🧪

22/100

“You may not use a calculator in tests or in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she can't teach her material.
  • only gives notes not a professor that will show you how to get to the problem and answer.
  • two hours are writing and writing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and inconsistent.
  • It is a bit difficult and complicated to be able to pass.
  • her study guide does not go with exams.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • You may not use a calculator in tests or in class.
  • we do 1 or 2 exercises per chapter

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but both give specific and consistent warnings about teaching difficulty.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1031 review
TRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1