AI Rate Professor

English

Dede Mousseau

FRENCH2 · ENGL1A80459 · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGL3 · ENG46B · ENGLISH1A · FRENCH1 · FRENC0 · FRENC1 · ENG1B · ENG3 · ENGLI1A · FRENC8145 · ENGENG · ENGLISH · ENGL46B · ENGLISH47 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if and teach yourself while benefiting from flexibility.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedConfusing InstructionsFlexible GradingKind PersonalitySelf-Teaching Needed
  • Students often describe her as kind and knowledgeable but .
  • , and .
  • Grades can be forgiving, but and tolerate confusion.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A seems fairly easy for independent students because and rewrites appear common, and some classes require little work.

All authoritative evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online reviews counted.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material itself is not consistently hard, but and disorganization make the class feel harder than it should.

, so no online comparison is available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

One review , though enforcement appears loose after students show up.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Many students strongly warn against taking her because confusion and disorganization outweigh her kindness and flexibility.

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students mention , and easy papers, though grade clarity is poor.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload often sounds light to moderate, but .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students often like her personally but repeatedly describe her teaching as , and disorganized.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Reviews mainly mention papers, essays, rewrites, participation, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

for kindness but strong complaints about organization and clarity.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say the and consistent structure.

What students said

“Horrible, no organization whatsoever, very inconsistent.”
FRENCH1
“Turn those in on time and you will get an "A".”
ENG46B
“You need to be a self-motivated student to get anything out of the class.”
FRENCH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but one review explicitly mentions a and most assessment appears assignment-based.

Take-Home MidtermPaper-Based AssessmentParticipation Grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-counted reviews mention a take-home online midterm and policy.

Take-Home MidtermPapersParticipation
“ ”
ENGL1A
“Expects no work besides the .”
ENG46B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a wealth of knowledge. I love her teaching style. The nicest, most flexible teacher you will ever have. You need to be a self-motivated student to get anything out of the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Terrible professor! Do not take any classes from her! She is NOT prepared when class starts, ”

⚖️

76/100

“Class was easy you could rewrite all but 2 of the assignments.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“Stay away; far, far away.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a wealth of knowledge. I love her teaching style.
  • Nice lady but not the greatest teacher.
  • Very nice teacher, but she confuses me and HERSELF.

Theme 2

📚 About Organization

  • Horrible, no organization whatsoever, very inconsistent.
  • She never knew when she had assigned things and when things were due.
  • don't count on the syllabus.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Turn those in on time and you will get an "A".
  • Great teacher! very flexible! get her while she's still teaching good for easy grade.
  • You could turn pretty much everything in late though.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 33 reviews across many years show a consistent pattern of kindness, flexibility, confusion, and disorganization.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG39 reviews
ENG1A5 reviews
ENGL32 reviews
ENGLISH2 reviews
FRENCH12 reviews
Show 13 more courses
ENG1B1 review
ENG46B1 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL1A804591 review
ENGL46B1 review
ENGLI1A1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH471 review
FRENC01 review
FRENC11 review
FRENC81451 review
FRENCH21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values